IRSL applies IRT to reduce scaling law estimation from O(M×N) to O(M+N) parameters, enabling reliable estimates with only 50 questions per benchmark after calibration and generalizable ability scores across related benchmarks.
Reliable and
10 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
10
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 10representative citing papers
AGC-Bench introduces a multi-domain creativity benchmark for LLMs, recovers a general 'c' factor explaining 81.5% of variance, and finds humans still outperform top models on matched tasks.
Across 51 quantized checkpoints, quality metrics fail to predict safety drops in 36 pairings and 10 hidden-danger cases, while a new RTSI screen routes all 10 dangerous rows to testing at matched bucket size.
A graph-based MIS prompt selection method on embedding similarity graphs yields reduced benchmark subsets with highly consistent LLM rankings (Kendall's W ≥ 0.90 in 99.2% of cases) and 25-48% size reduction at higher thresholds.
Dynamic Boundary Evaluation locates each LLM's performance boundary at ~50% pass probability via a calibrated item bank and Skill-Guided Boundary Search algorithm to enable unified, adaptive evaluations across safety, capability, and truthfulness.
LCAE is introduced as a Rasch-model metric that aligns LLM self-reported confidence with latent error probability derived from ability and item difficulty, shown to improve calibration on a medical dataset across 20 models.
A pre-response classifier predicts user rejection risk for clinical LLM outputs with AUROC 0.719 over 4.5 months of deployment data by incorporating deployment-specific context.
Simple averaging of evaluation scores degrades in rank correlation with ground truth under data sparsity and difficulty variation, while a two-parameter logistic Item Response Theory model maintains high correlation across conditions.
citing papers explorer
-
Item Response Scaling Laws: A Measurement Theory Approach for Efficient and Generalizable Neural Scaling Estimation
IRSL applies IRT to reduce scaling law estimation from O(M×N) to O(M+N) parameters, enabling reliable estimates with only 50 questions per benchmark after calibration and generalizable ability scores across related benchmarks.
-
AGC-Bench: Measuring Artificial General Creativity
AGC-Bench introduces a multi-domain creativity benchmark for LLMs, recovers a general 'c' factor explaining 81.5% of variance, and finds humans still outperform top models on matched tasks.
-
Quality Is Not a Safety Proxy Under Quantization
Across 51 quantized checkpoints, quality metrics fail to predict safety drops in 36 pairings and 10 hidden-danger cases, while a new RTSI screen routes all 10 dangerous rows to testing at matched bucket size.
-
Consistent and Distinctive: LLM Benchmark Efficiency via Maximum Independent Set Prompt Selection on Similarity Graphs
A graph-based MIS prompt selection method on embedding similarity graphs yields reduced benchmark subsets with highly consistent LLM rankings (Kendall's W ≥ 0.90 in 99.2% of cases) and 25-48% size reduction at higher thresholds.
-
Beyond Fixed Benchmarks and Worst-Case Attacks: Dynamic Boundary Evaluation for Language Models
Dynamic Boundary Evaluation locates each LLM's performance boundary at ~50% pass probability via a calibrated item bank and Skill-Guided Boundary Search algorithm to enable unified, adaptive evaluations across safety, capability, and truthfulness.
-
Latent Confidence Alignment for LLM Self-Assessment
LCAE is introduced as a Rasch-model metric that aligns LLM self-reported confidence with latent error probability derived from ability and item difficulty, shown to improve calibration on a medical dataset across 20 models.
-
Deployment-Centered Evaluation: Predicting Query-Level Rejection Risk in a Clinical LLM System
A pre-response classifier predicts user rejection risk for clinical LLM outputs with AUROC 0.719 over 4.5 months of deployment data by incorporating deployment-specific context.
-
The Scaling Law of Evaluation Failure: Why Simple Averaging Collapses Under Data Sparsity and Item Difficulty Gaps, and How Item Response Theory Recovers Ground Truth Across Domains
Simple averaging of evaluation scores degrades in rank correlation with ground truth under data sparsity and difficulty variation, while a two-parameter logistic Item Response Theory model maintains high correlation across conditions.
- Why Do Safety Guardrails Degrade Across Languages?
- Growing Pains: Extensible and Efficient LLM Benchmarking Via Fixed Parameter Calibration