StemBind benchmark diagnoses MLLM failures in abstract visual reasoning by separating perception, rule induction, and answer selection on shared stems, finding a persistent rule-to-instance binding gap even when perception and rule are correct.
OMIBench: Benchmarking Olympiad-Level Multi-Image Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Model
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have made substantial advances in reasoning tasks at the Olympiad level. Nevertheless, current Olympiad-level multimodal reasoning benchmarks for these models often emphasize single-image analysis and fail to exploit contextual information across multiple images. We present OMIBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate Olympiad-level reasoning when the required evidence is distributed over multiple images. It contains problems from biology, chemistry, mathematics, and physics Olympiads, together with manually annotated rationales and evaluation protocols for both exact and semantic answer matching. Across extensive experiments on OMIBench, we observe meaningful performance gaps in existing models. Even the strongest LVLMs, such as Gemini-3-Pro, attain only about 50% on the benchmark. These results position OMIBench as a focused resources for studying and improving multi-image reasoning in LVLMs.
fields
cs.CV 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
StemBind: When MLLMs Get Lost Between Rules and Instances in Abstract Visual Reasoning
StemBind benchmark diagnoses MLLM failures in abstract visual reasoning by separating perception, rule induction, and answer selection on shared stems, finding a persistent rule-to-instance binding gap even when perception and rule are correct.