A planner-orchestrator system learns long-horizon image editing by maximizing outcome-based rewards from a vision-language judge and refining plans from successful trajectories.
Canonical reference
Checklists are better than reward models for aligning language models.CoRR, abs/2507.18624, 2025
Canonical reference. 100% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 10roles
background 6polarities
background 6representative citing papers
Think-with-Rubrics has LLMs generate rubrics internally before responding, outperforming external rubric-as-reward baselines by 3.87 points on average across benchmarks.
rDPO uses offline-built rubrics to generate on-policy preference data for DPO, raising benchmark scores in visual tasks over outcome-based filtering and style baselines.
Rubric-based RL verifiers can be gamed via partial criterion satisfaction and implicit-to-explicit tricks, yielding proxy gains that do not improve quality under rubric-free judges; stronger verifiers reduce but do not eliminate the mismatch.
DeltaRubric decomposes multimodal preference evaluation into self-generated planning and verification steps within a single model, producing large accuracy improvements on VL-RewardBench via multi-role reinforcement learning.
RVPO penalizes variance across multiple reward signals during RLHF advantage aggregation, using a LogSumExp operator as a smooth variance penalty to reduce constraint neglect in LLM alignment.
PaTaRM converts pairwise preference data into pointwise reward signals via a novel PAR mechanism and task-adaptive rubrics, reporting 8.7% gains on RewardBench/RMBench and 13.6% relative RLHF improvement.
RaR uses aggregated rubric feedback as rewards in on-policy RL, delivering up to 31% relative gains on HealthBench and 7% on GPQA-Diamond versus direct Likert LLM-as-judge baselines.
RLR³ extends RLVR to criterion-level rubric verification via dual execution paths, minimal exposure masking, hierarchical aggregation, and saturation mitigation, delivering 4.7-point gains over base on 15 benchmarks with Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B.
Fine-tuned simulators grounded in real human data produce LLM assistants that win more often against real users than those trained against role-playing simulators.
citing papers explorer
-
From Plans to Pixels: Learning to Plan and Orchestrate for Open-Ended Image Editing
A planner-orchestrator system learns long-horizon image editing by maximizing outcome-based rewards from a vision-language judge and refining plans from successful trajectories.
-
Think-with-Rubrics: From External Evaluator to Internal Reasoning Guidance
Think-with-Rubrics has LLMs generate rubrics internally before responding, outperforming external rubric-as-reward baselines by 3.87 points on average across benchmarks.
-
Visual Preference Optimization with Rubric Rewards
rDPO uses offline-built rubrics to generate on-policy preference data for DPO, raising benchmark scores in visual tasks over outcome-based filtering and style baselines.
-
Reward Hacking in Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning
Rubric-based RL verifiers can be gamed via partial criterion satisfaction and implicit-to-explicit tricks, yielding proxy gains that do not improve quality under rubric-free judges; stronger verifiers reduce but do not eliminate the mismatch.
-
DeltaRubric: Generative Multimodal Reward Modeling via Joint Planning and Verification
DeltaRubric decomposes multimodal preference evaluation into self-generated planning and verification steps within a single model, producing large accuracy improvements on VL-RewardBench via multi-role reinforcement learning.
-
RVPO: Risk-Sensitive Alignment via Variance Regularization
RVPO penalizes variance across multiple reward signals during RLHF advantage aggregation, using a LogSumExp operator as a smooth variance penalty to reduce constraint neglect in LLM alignment.
-
PaTaRM: Bridging Pairwise and Pointwise Signals via Preference-Aware Task-Adaptive Reward Modeling
PaTaRM converts pairwise preference data into pointwise reward signals via a novel PAR mechanism and task-adaptive rubrics, reporting 8.7% gains on RewardBench/RMBench and 13.6% relative RLHF improvement.
-
Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains
RaR uses aggregated rubric feedback as rewards in on-policy RL, delivering up to 31% relative gains on HealthBench and 7% on GPQA-Diamond versus direct Likert LLM-as-judge baselines.
-
Reinforcement Learning with Robust Rubric Rewards
RLR³ extends RLVR to criterion-level rubric verification via dual execution paths, minimal exposure masking, hierarchical aggregation, and saturation mitigation, delivering 4.7-point gains over base on 15 benchmarks with Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B.
-
Quantifying the Utility of User Simulators for Building Collaborative LLM Assistants
Fine-tuned simulators grounded in real human data produce LLM assistants that win more often against real users than those trained against role-playing simulators.