Pith. sign in

hub

Review outline

29 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 16 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

29 Pith papers citing it
16 external citations · Pith
abstract

We study the problem of watermarking large language models (LLMs) generated text -- one of the most promising approaches for addressing the safety challenges of LLM usage. In this paper, we propose a rigorous theoretical framework to quantify the effectiveness and robustness of LLM watermarks. We propose a robust and high-quality watermark method, Unigram-Watermark, by extending an existing approach with a simplified fixed grouping strategy. We prove that our watermark method enjoys guaranteed generation quality, correctness in watermark detection, and is robust against text editing and paraphrasing. Experiments on three varying LLMs and two datasets verify that our Unigram-Watermark achieves superior detection accuracy and comparable generation quality in perplexity, thus promoting the responsible use of LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/XuandongZhao/Unigram-Watermark.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 2 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

Beyond Heuristic Tuning: Power-Calibrated LLM Watermarking

stat.ML · 2026-07-06 · accept · novelty 7.0

A power-calibrated statistical framework gives closed-form links from KGW watermark parameters (γ, δ) to detection power and KL distortion, enabling principled Pareto-optimal selection.

Can we Watermark Low-Entropy LLM Outputs?

cs.CR · 2026-04-13 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

The authors give constructions for provably undetectable watermarking of constant-entropy LLM outputs that are robust to random substitutions (under subexponential LPN) and to substitutions plus random deletions (under an additional heuristic or pseudorandom ECC).

Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?

cs.CL · 2023-03-17 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Recursive paraphrasing attacks substantially lower detection rates for multiple AI text detectors with only minor quality loss, while a theoretical analysis ties best-case AUROC to total variation distance between human and AI distributions.

citing papers explorer

Showing 29 of 29 citing papers.