VoxSafeBench reveals that speech language models recognize social norms from text but fail to apply them when acoustic cues like speaker or scene determine the appropriate response.
hub Canonical reference
Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models
Canonical reference. 83% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
90
Pith papers citing it
Background
83% of classified citations
abstract
This paper aims to help structure the risk landscape associated with large-scale Language Models (LMs). In order to foster advances in responsible innovation, an in-depth understanding of the potential risks posed by these models is needed. A wide range of established and anticipated risks are analysed in detail, drawing on multidisciplinary expertise and literature from computer science, linguistics, and social sciences. We outline six specific risk areas: I. Discrimination, Exclusion and Toxicity, II. Information Hazards, III. Misinformation Harms, V. Malicious Uses, V. Human-Computer Interaction Harms, VI. Automation, Access, and Environmental Harms. The first area concerns the perpetuation of stereotypes, unfair discrimination, exclusionary norms, toxic language, and lower performance by social group for LMs. The second focuses on risks from private data leaks or LMs correctly inferring sensitive information. The third addresses risks arising from poor, false or misleading information including in sensitive domains, and knock-on risks such as the erosion of trust in shared information. The fourth considers risks from actors who try to use LMs to cause harm. The fifth focuses on risks specific to LLMs used to underpin conversational agents that interact with human users, including unsafe use, manipulation or deception. The sixth discusses the risk of environmental harm, job automation, and other challenges that may have a disparate effect on different social groups or communities. In total, we review 21 risks in-depth. We discuss the points of origin of different risks and point to potential mitigation approaches. Lastly, we discuss organisational responsibilities in implementing mitigations, and the role of collaboration and participation. We highlight directions for further research, particularly on expanding the toolkit for assessing and evaluating the outlined risks in LMs.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 27
other 2
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract This paper aims to help structure the risk landscape associated with large-scale Language Models (LMs). In order to foster advances in responsible innovation, an in-depth understanding of the potential risks posed by these models is needed. A wide range of established and anticipated risks are analysed in detail, drawing on multidisciplinary expertise and literature from computer science, linguistics, and social sciences. We outline six specific risk areas: I. Discrimination, Exclusion and Toxicity, II. Information Hazards, III. Misinformation Harms, V. Malicious Uses, V. Human-Computer Inte
co-cited works
representative citing papers
LazyAttention kernelizes deferred positional encoding to enable zero-copy, position-agnostic KV cache reuse, delivering 1.37× lower TTFT and 1.40× higher throughput than Block-Attention under skewed document distributions while preserving output quality.
Persona Attack uses step-by-step memory injections to achieve up to 95% success in making LLMs ignore safety alignments, with effectiveness depending on model memory and instruction combinations.
A hybrid first-order then zeroth-order optimization approach improves robustness of safety-aligned LLMs while preserving utility, with layer-wise sensitivity estimation for efficiency.
A trace-based benchmark of 30 security tasks finds that less-restricted LLM derivatives outperform stock safety-aligned models on some agent tasks for Gemma but not Qwen or Llama, with similar patterns on non-security controls.
Introduces TBPO, which derives a Bregman-divergence density-ratio matching objective for token-level preference optimization that generalizes DPO while preserving the induced optimal policy.
BiAxisAudit measures LLM bias on two axes—across-prompt sensitivity via factorial grids and within-response divergence via split coding—revealing that task format explains as much variance as model choice and that 63.6% of bias signals appear in only one layer.
Persona-driven workflow and interface improve automated and human-AI red-teaming of generative AI by incorporating diverse perspectives into adversarial prompt creation.
Decoding-time use of process reward models for bias mitigation raises fairness scores by up to 0.40 on a bilingual benchmark while preserving fluency across four LLMs and extends to open-ended generation with low overhead.
The paper delivers a unified framework for fairness in speech technologies by formalizing seven definitions, organizing research into three paradigms, diagnosing pipeline-specific biases, and mapping mitigations to those sources.
A systematic review of 50 studies identifies 69 LLM-assisted tasks in empirical software engineering, concentrated in data processing and analysis with gaps in human-centered integration and reproducibility reporting.
A new 7x4 taxonomy organizes agentic AI security threats by architectural layer and persistence timescale, revealing under-explored upper layers and missing defenses after surveying 116 papers.
Adaptive multi-agent LLM pipelines with bandit-based sampling achieve lower false positive rates (0.095 vs 0.159) than single-agent models on two behavioral health datasets while maintaining similar false negative rates.
Ghost-100 benchmark shows prompt tone drives hallucination rates and intensities in VLMs, with non-monotonic peaks at intermediate pressure and task-specific differences that aggregate metrics hide.
IntervenSim is an intervention-aware social network simulation that couples source interventions with crowd interactions in a feedback loop, improving MAPE by 41.6% and DTW by 66.9% over prior static frameworks on real-world events.
This paper proposes a five-dimension ethical design space for front-end biometric translation in sensor-fused health AI agents, including adaptive disclosure as a guardrail against hallucinations and biofeedback loops.
Large Reasoning Models override their own initial safety recognition during multi-step reasoning in a failure mode called Self-Jailbreak, which Chain-of-Guardrail mitigates through targeted trajectory-level step interventions.
Gato is a multi-modal, multi-task, multi-embodiment generalist policy using one transformer network to handle text, vision, games, and robotics tasks.
OPT releases open decoder-only transformers up to 175B parameters that match GPT-3 performance at one-seventh the carbon cost, along with code and training logs.
Flamingo models reach new state-of-the-art few-shot results on image and video tasks by bridging frozen vision and language models with cross-attention layers trained on interleaved web-scale data.
Grad Detect uses internal gradient patterns from one inference pass to predict LLM hallucinations and abstention, outperforming confidence and sampling baselines on Q&A benchmarks with most signal in the final five layers.
CARTOGRAPH integrates unresolved-subspace steering, ambiguity closure, and residual-based refusal under a local linear-Gaussian model, outperforming baselines on testbeds and correctly flagging inconclusive claims in a retrospective A-Lab audit.
MedHarm benchmark shows aligned LLMs and guardrails can still produce unsafe responses on high-risk medical queries, indicating medical safety requires domain-specific testing.
Introduces HRC model for game-theoretic decomposition of preferences into orthogonal transitive and cyclic components, paired with DSPPO for dynamic Nash-seeking alignment, reporting gains over BT and GPM baselines on RewardBench and downstream LLM evaluations.
citing papers explorer
-
Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models
Gemini Ultra reaches human-expert performance on MMLU for the first time and sets new state-of-the-art results on 30 of 32 benchmarks, including all 20 multimodal ones tested.
-
Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4
Translating unsafe inputs to low-resource languages jailbreaks GPT-4 at rates on par with or exceeding state-of-the-art attacks.
-
Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models
Repeating training data up to 4 epochs yields negligible loss increase versus unique data for fixed compute, and a new scaling law accounts for the decaying value of repeated tokens and excess parameters.
-
Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversations
UltraChat supplies 1.5 million high-quality multi-turn dialogues that, when used to fine-tune LLaMA, produce UltraLLaMA, which outperforms prior open-source chat models including Vicuna.
-
Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Models
Med-PaLM 2 achieves 86.5% accuracy on MedQA and approaches or exceeds prior state-of-the-art on other medical QA benchmarks while receiving higher physician preference ratings than human answers on consumer questions.
-
Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes
Distilling step-by-step uses LLM-generated rationales as additional supervision in a multi-task framework so that 770M-parameter models outperform 540B-parameter models on NLP benchmarks with only 80% of the data.
-
BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Finance
BloombergGPT is a 50B parameter LLM trained on a 708B token mixed financial and general dataset that outperforms prior models on financial benchmarks while preserving general LLM performance.
-
Enhancing Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Causal Attribution Model for Precision Fine-Tuning
A causal attribution model is proposed that applies do-operators to quantify component contributions in LLMs' causal reasoning, motivating a fine-tuned model for pairwise causal discovery that combines knowledge and numerical data.
-
Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignment
Survey organizes LLM trustworthiness into seven categories and 29 sub-categories, measures eight sub-categories on popular models, and finds that more aligned models generally score higher but with varying effectiveness.
-
PaLM 2 Technical Report
PaLM 2 reports state-of-the-art results on language, reasoning, and multilingual tasks with improved efficiency over PaLM.