Readers see AI disclosure in writing as more necessary than writers, particularly for irreplaceable and direct AI contributions, with intentionality showing opposite effects on each group and effort showing none.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 3years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
Humans exhibit greater source-label bias in logical fallacy judgments than LLMs, which maintain more consistent evaluations regardless of source cues.
Visible process cues such as videos and documented time spent increase authenticity and value judgments for creative outputs, partially closing the gap between human and AI-generated work.
citing papers explorer
-
What Influences Readers' and Writers' Perceived Necessity of AI Disclosure?
Readers see AI disclosure in writing as more necessary than writers, particularly for irreplaceable and direct AI contributions, with intentionality showing opposite effects on each group and effort showing none.
-
Label Over Logic? How Source Cues Bias Human Fallacy Judgments More Than LLMs
Humans exhibit greater source-label bias in logical fallacy judgments than LLMs, which maintain more consistent evaluations regardless of source cues.
-
Struggle Premium : How Human Effort and Imperfection Drive Perceived Value in the Age of AI
Visible process cues such as videos and documented time spent increase authenticity and value judgments for creative outputs, partially closing the gap between human and AI-generated work.