13 participants became convinced AI understands human values after chatbot interactions evaluated with the VAPT toolkit.
Does My Chatbot Have an Agenda? Understanding Human and
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
other 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
other 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
Inverse Turing Bench evaluates LLMs on distinguishing human-human from human-AI dialogues, with GPTZero at 89.41%, Claude Opus-4.6 at 77.92%, and GPT-5.5 at 75.94% accuracy.
PAPEL, a parent-AI collaborative system with four modules grounded in play scenes, led to more integrated parent utterances and increased parent-child conversational turns in a study of 16 dyads compared to a chatbot baseline.
citing papers explorer
-
AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual Conversations
13 participants became convinced AI understands human values after chatbot interactions evaluated with the VAPT toolkit.
-
PAPEL: A Collaborative System for Parental Guidance during Preschool Play-Based English Learning
PAPEL, a parent-AI collaborative system with four modules grounded in play scenes, led to more integrated parent utterances and increased parent-child conversational turns in a study of 16 dyads compared to a chatbot baseline.