pith. sign in

super hub Baseline reference

Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system

Baseline reference. 67% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.

16 Pith papers citing it
41k external citations · external index
Baseline 67% of classified citations

hub tools

citation-role summary

baseline 4 method 2

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • method a: Single-span bridges do not have a bent and are not included in the ML-based predictions. b: There is a small proportion of bridges that have more than 7 columns per bent. These bridges are considered as outliers and have been excluded before the model training. Figure 7: Proposed classifier chain for imputing missing attributes. An XGBoost classifier [40] is used as the predictive model to impute the four target attributes. The hyperparameters of each classifier are tuned using Bayesian optim
  • baseline Despite their efficiency, such adaptation can be unstable and prone to overfitting when supervision is scarce [48, 10, 23], highlighting the need for more data-efficient and robust fine-tuning strategies. Interestingly, the tabular learning community has long relied on a different paradigm to address similar challenges: gradient boosting. Systems such as XGBoost [ 5], LightGBM [20], and CatBoost [35] consistently achieve strong performance across a wide range of tabular tasks and are known to be
  • baseline wi for each paper by log-normalizing and aggregating its GitHub stars, citation counts, influential citations, and Altmetric score. The distribution of the four log-normalized ground-truth impact metrics utilized in the dataset is shown in Figure 4. Baselines.We benchmark FAME against three distinct categories of evaluators. First, we evaluate ML models, including XGBoost [9], SVR [11, 27], Transformer [31] and TGCN [39], trained directly 5 Table 1: Prospective forecasting performance across an
  • method Extreme wildfires are challenging to predict [41], as they emerge from the complex interplay of fire weather [9, 10, 37], topography [33], vegetation fuels [32, 37], and human factors such as ignition and fire suppression [16, 19, 26, 44], all of which are difficult to fully represent in process-based wildfire models. Whereas machine learning (ML) approaches such as XGBoost [8] have shown promise in wildfire prediction [5, 18, 21, 25, 42], outperforming process-based wildfire models [41], they t

authors

co-cited works

years

2026 13 2025 3

representative citing papers

Cognitive Alpha Mining via LLM-Driven Code-Based Evolution

cs.CL · 2025-11-24 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

CogAlpha combines LLM reasoning with code-level evolutionary search to discover financial alphas that show higher predictive accuracy and generalization than prior methods on five stock datasets.

citing papers explorer

Showing 16 of 16 citing papers.