pith. sign in

super hub Baseline reference

Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system

Baseline reference. 67% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.

16 Pith papers citing it
41k external citations · external index
Baseline 67% of classified citations

hub tools

citation-role summary

baseline 4 method 2

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • method a: Single-span bridges do not have a bent and are not included in the ML-based predictions. b: There is a small proportion of bridges that have more than 7 columns per bent. These bridges are considered as outliers and have been excluded before the model training. Figure 7: Proposed classifier chain for imputing missing attributes. An XGBoost classifier [40] is used as the predictive model to impute the four target attributes. The hyperparameters of each classifier are tuned using Bayesian optim
  • baseline Despite their efficiency, such adaptation can be unstable and prone to overfitting when supervision is scarce [48, 10, 23], highlighting the need for more data-efficient and robust fine-tuning strategies. Interestingly, the tabular learning community has long relied on a different paradigm to address similar challenges: gradient boosting. Systems such as XGBoost [ 5], LightGBM [20], and CatBoost [35] consistently achieve strong performance across a wide range of tabular tasks and are known to be
  • baseline wi for each paper by log-normalizing and aggregating its GitHub stars, citation counts, influential citations, and Altmetric score. The distribution of the four log-normalized ground-truth impact metrics utilized in the dataset is shown in Figure 4. Baselines.We benchmark FAME against three distinct categories of evaluators. First, we evaluate ML models, including XGBoost [9], SVR [11, 27], Transformer [31] and TGCN [39], trained directly 5 Table 1: Prospective forecasting performance across an
  • method Extreme wildfires are challenging to predict [41], as they emerge from the complex interplay of fire weather [9, 10, 37], topography [33], vegetation fuels [32, 37], and human factors such as ignition and fire suppression [16, 19, 26, 44], all of which are difficult to fully represent in process-based wildfire models. Whereas machine learning (ML) approaches such as XGBoost [8] have shown promise in wildfire prediction [5, 18, 21, 25, 42], outperforming process-based wildfire models [41], they t

authors

co-cited works

years

2026 13 2025 3

clear filters

representative citing papers

Cognitive Alpha Mining via LLM-Driven Code-Based Evolution

cs.CL · 2025-11-24 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

CogAlpha combines LLM reasoning with code-level evolutionary search to discover financial alphas that show higher predictive accuracy and generalization than prior methods on five stock datasets.

citing papers explorer

Showing 15 of 15 citing papers after filters.