Pith. sign in

Propositional interpretability in artificial intelligence

6 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 2 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

6 Pith papers citing it
2 external citations · external index

fields

cs.AI 5 cs.CL 1

years

2026 4 2025 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 6

representative citing papers

The Impossibility of Eliciting Latent Knowledge

cs.AI · 2026-06-10 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Proves that no behavior-dependent feedback training strategy can guarantee an honest agent for latent knowledge even with perfect training feedback.

Radical AI Interpretability

cs.AI · 2026-06-25 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

A framework is proposed for solving for an AI system's beliefs and desires from its computational facts, with criteria for success tied to interpretability tests and emphasis on holistic attribution.

The Impact of Off-Policy Training Data on Probe Generalisation

cs.AI · 2025-11-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Off-policy training data for LLM behavior probes causes significant generalization failures especially for intent-based behaviors like deception, and performance on coerced incentivised data correlates with real on-policy success.

Do Linear Probes Generalize Better in Persona Coordinates?

cs.AI · 2026-05-10 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0 · 2 refs

Persona axes derived from contrastive prompts and PCA yield linear probes that generalize better than raw-activation probes across 10 datasets for deception and sycophancy.

The New Associationism: Lessons from Deep Learning

cs.AI · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

Supervised learning across AI systems vindicates a uniform error-driven associationism for cognition, though operating inside advanced computational structures beyond classical associationist models.

Mechanistic Interpretability Needs Philosophy

cs.CL · 2025-06-23 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

The paper claims that mechanistic interpretability needs philosophy as a partner to clarify concepts, refine methods, and navigate epistemic and ethical complexities in AI systems.

citing papers explorer

Showing 6 of 6 citing papers.

  • The Impossibility of Eliciting Latent Knowledge cs.AI · 2026-06-10 · unverdicted · none · ref 6

    Proves that no behavior-dependent feedback training strategy can guarantee an honest agent for latent knowledge even with perfect training feedback.

  • Radical AI Interpretability cs.AI · 2026-06-25 · unverdicted · none · ref 23

    A framework is proposed for solving for an AI system's beliefs and desires from its computational facts, with criteria for success tied to interpretability tests and emphasis on holistic attribution.

  • The Impact of Off-Policy Training Data on Probe Generalisation cs.AI · 2025-11-21 · unverdicted · none · ref 6

    Off-policy training data for LLM behavior probes causes significant generalization failures especially for intent-based behaviors like deception, and performance on coerced incentivised data correlates with real on-policy success.

  • Do Linear Probes Generalize Better in Persona Coordinates? cs.AI · 2026-05-10 · unverdicted · none · ref 23 · 2 links

    Persona axes derived from contrastive prompts and PCA yield linear probes that generalize better than raw-activation probes across 10 datasets for deception and sycophancy.

  • The New Associationism: Lessons from Deep Learning cs.AI · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · none · ref 67

    Supervised learning across AI systems vindicates a uniform error-driven associationism for cognition, though operating inside advanced computational structures beyond classical associationist models.

  • Mechanistic Interpretability Needs Philosophy cs.CL · 2025-06-23 · unverdicted · none · ref 7

    The paper claims that mechanistic interpretability needs philosophy as a partner to clarify concepts, refine methods, and navigate epistemic and ethical complexities in AI systems.