Pith. sign in

Talking turns: Benchmarking audio foundation models on turn-taking dynamics

7 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

7 Pith papers citing it
abstract

The recent wave of audio foundation models (FMs) could provide new capabilities for conversational modeling. However, there have been limited efforts to evaluate these audio FMs comprehensively on their ability to have natural and interactive conversations. To engage in meaningful conversation with the end user, we would want the FMs to additionally perform a fluent succession of turns without too much overlapping speech or long stretches of silence. Inspired by this, we ask whether the recently proposed audio FMs can understand, predict, and perform turn-taking events? To answer this, we propose a novel evaluation protocol that can assess spoken dialog system's turn-taking capabilities using a supervised model as a judge that has been trained to predict turn-taking events in human-human conversations. Using this protocol, we present the first comprehensive user study that evaluates existing spoken dialogue systems on their ability to perform turn-taking events and reveal many interesting insights, such as they sometimes do not understand when to speak up, can interrupt too aggressively and rarely backchannel. We further evaluate multiple open-source and proprietary audio FMs accessible through APIs on carefully curated test benchmarks from Switchboard to measure their ability to understand and predict turn-taking events and identify significant room for improvement. We will open source our evaluation platform to promote the development of advanced conversational AI systems.

citation-role summary

dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 6 2025 1

roles

dataset 1

polarities

use dataset 1

representative citing papers

Adaptive Turn-Taking for Real-time Multi-Party Voice Agents

eess.AS · 2026-06-11 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0 · 2 refs

ModeratorLM conditions a streaming speech LLM on assigned roles for adaptive turn-taking in multi-party settings, reporting over 40% higher precision and 70% higher recall than non-role baselines on real meetings and a new synthetic dataset.

citing papers explorer

Showing 7 of 7 citing papers.