RISE is an inference-time semantic reranking framework that refines low-confidence predictions in rhetorical role labeling using contrastively learned label representations, delivering an average +9.15 macro-F1 gain on hard examples across eight datasets and seven models.
Title resolution pending
7 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
7
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 7verdicts
UNVERDICTED 7representative citing papers
Item response theory applied to 17 LLMs on SciEntsBank and Beetle reveals that models with similar overall scores differ sharply in robustness to difficult responses, with errors clustering on partial-credit labels.
VLMs as judges exhibit informativeness bias by favoring detailed but image-inconsistent answers; BIRCH mitigates it by first correcting answers against the image, reducing bias up to 17% and improving performance up to 9.8%.
Decision theory shows that LLM cascades are structurally limited by always incurring the cheap model's cost before deciding to escalate, with the best performance given by the envelope of pairwise cascades rather than fixed chains or many stages.
LaaB improves LLM hallucination detection by mapping self-judgment labels back into neural feature space and using mutual learning under logical consistency constraints between responses and meta-judgments.
300 high-quality Stoic examples align small LLMs with inward virtues via preference optimization but leave outward cosmopolitan duties unlearned.
ARMove is a transferable framework for human mobility prediction that combines agentic LLM reasoning, feature management, and large-small model synergy to outperform baselines on several metrics while improving interpretability and robustness.
citing papers explorer
-
Semantic Reranking at Inference Time for Hard Examples in Rhetorical Role Labeling
RISE is an inference-time semantic reranking framework that refines low-confidence predictions in rhetorical role labeling using contrastively learned label representations, delivering an average +9.15 macro-F1 gain on hard examples across eight datasets and seven models.
-
Estimating LLM Grading Ability and Response Difficulty in Automatic Short Answer Grading via Item Response Theory
Item response theory applied to 17 LLMs on SciEntsBank and Beetle reveals that models with similar overall scores differ sharply in robustness to difficult responses, with errors clustering on partial-credit labels.
-
When Vision-Language Models Judge Without Seeing: Exposing Informativeness Bias
VLMs as judges exhibit informativeness bias by favoring detailed but image-inconsistent answers; BIRCH mitigates it by first correcting answers against the image, reducing bias up to 17% and improving performance up to 9.8%.
-
Is Escalation Worth It? A Decision-Theoretic Characterization of LLM Cascades
Decision theory shows that LLM cascades are structurally limited by always incurring the cheap model's cost before deciding to escalate, with the best performance given by the envelope of pairwise cascades rather than fixed chains or many stages.
-
Logical Consistency as a Bridge: Improving LLM Hallucination Detection via Label Constraint Modeling between Responses and Self-Judgments
LaaB improves LLM hallucination detection by mapping self-judgment labels back into neural feature space and using mutual learning under logical consistency constraints between responses and meta-judgments.
-
StoicLLM: Preference Optimization for Philosophical Alignment in Small Language Models
300 high-quality Stoic examples align small LLMs with inward virtues via preference optimization but leave outward cosmopolitan duties unlearned.
-
ARMove: Learning to Predict Human Mobility through Agentic Reasoning
ARMove is a transferable framework for human mobility prediction that combines agentic LLM reasoning, feature management, and large-small model synergy to outperform baselines on several metrics while improving interpretability and robustness.