A systematic analysis of 59 quantum software testing empirical studies reveals highly diverse designs, inconsistent reporting, and open methodological challenges, leading to recommendations for future work.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
other 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 3representative citing papers
Noise from quantum hardware simulators significantly alters mutant detection distances, making equivalent mutants harder to separate from faults, with output-distribution metrics reaching 73.03% accuracy and 74.89% F1-score under device-specific thresholds.
Quantum circuits show high average condition (97.56%) and decision (97.63%) coverage but lower path coverage (71.84%), with probabilistic versions adding confidence levels (averages 88.87%, 88.65%, 37.18%); mutation testing reveals weak or no correlation between structural coverage and fault finding
citing papers explorer
-
A Methodological Analysis of Empirical Studies in Quantum Software Testing
A systematic analysis of 59 quantum software testing empirical studies reveals highly diverse designs, inconsistent reporting, and open methodological challenges, leading to recommendations for future work.
-
Robust Mutation Analysis of Quantum Programs Under Noise
Noise from quantum hardware simulators significantly alters mutant detection distances, making equivalent mutants harder to separate from faults, with output-distribution metrics reaching 73.03% accuracy and 74.89% F1-score under device-specific thresholds.
-
Probabilistic Condition, Decision and Path Coverage of Circuit-based Quantum Programs
Quantum circuits show high average condition (97.56%) and decision (97.63%) coverage but lower path coverage (71.84%), with probabilistic versions adding confidence levels (averages 88.87%, 88.65%, 37.18%); mutation testing reveals weak or no correlation between structural coverage and fault finding