Pith. sign in

hub

Detecting and Evaluating Medical Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models

15 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 6 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

15 Pith papers citing it
6 external citations · Pith
abstract

Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly integral to healthcare applications, including medical visual question answering and imaging report generation. While these models inherit the robust capabilities of foundational Large Language Models (LLMs), they also inherit susceptibility to hallucinations-a significant concern in high-stakes medical contexts where the margin for error is minimal. However, currently, there are no dedicated methods or benchmarks for hallucination detection and evaluation in the medical field. To bridge this gap, we introduce Med-HallMark, the first benchmark specifically designed for hallucination detection and evaluation within the medical multimodal domain. This benchmark provides multi-tasking hallucination support, multifaceted hallucination data, and hierarchical hallucination categorization. Furthermore, we propose the MediHall Score, a new medical evaluative metric designed to assess LVLMs' hallucinations through a hierarchical scoring system that considers the severity and type of hallucination, thereby enabling a granular assessment of potential clinical impacts. We also present MediHallDetector, a novel Medical LVLM engineered for precise hallucination detection, which employs multitask training for hallucination detection. Through extensive experimental evaluations, we establish baselines for popular LVLMs using our benchmark. The findings indicate that MediHall Score provides a more nuanced understanding of hallucination impacts compared to traditional metrics and demonstrate the enhanced performance of MediHallDetector. We hope this work can significantly improve the reliability of LVLMs in medical applications. All resources of this work have been released at https://github.com/ydk122024/Med-HallMark.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 15

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Evaluating the Search Agent in a Parallel World

cs.AI · 2026-03-05 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Mind-ParaWorld creates parallel worlds with atomic facts to evaluate search agents on future scenarios, showing they synthesize evidence well but struggle with collection, coverage, sufficiency judgment, and stopping decisions.

citing papers explorer

Showing 15 of 15 citing papers.