AutoMedBench evaluates AI agents on long-horizon medical workflows across five stages and finds validation and submission as dominant failure points based on thousands of runs.
PhysicianBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Real-World EHR Environments
5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
5
Pith papers citing it
abstract
We introduce PhysicianBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on physician tasks grounded in real clinical setting within electronic health record (EHR) environments. Existing medical agent benchmarks primarily focus on static knowledge recall, single-step atomic actions, or action intent without verifiable execution against the environment. As a result, they fail to capture the long-horizon, composite workflows that characterize real clinical systems. PhysicianBench comprises 100 long-horizon tasks adapted from real consultation cases between primary care and subspecialty physicians, with each task independently reviewed by a separate panel of physicians. Tasks are instantiated in an EHR environment with real patient records and accessed through the same standard APIs used by commercial EHR vendors. Tasks span 21 specialties (e.g., cardiology, endocrinology, oncology, psychiatry) and diverse workflow types (e.g., diagnosis interpretation, medication prescribing, treatment planning), requiring an average of 27 tool calls per task. Solving each task requires retrieving data across encounters, reasoning over heterogeneous clinical information, executing consequential clinical actions, and producing clinical documentation. Each task is decomposed into structured checkpoints (670 in total across the benchmark) capturing distinct stages of completion graded by task-specific scripts with execution-grounded verification. Across 13 proprietary and open-source LLM agents, the best-performing model achieves only 46% success rate (pass@1), while open-source models reach at most 19%, revealing a substantial gap between current agent capabilities and the demands of real-world clinical workflows. PhysicianBench provides a realistic and execution-grounded benchmark for measuring progress toward autonomous clinical agents.
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 5roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
HealthAgentBench is a new benchmark of 54 healthcare agent tasks where even the strongest frontier AI agent reaches only about 42% success rate on end-to-end clinical workflows.
RadThinking releases a large longitudinal CT VQA dataset stratified into foundation perception questions, single-rule reasoning questions, and compositional multi-step chains grounded in clinical reporting standards for cancer screening.
Fine-tuning a Spanish biomedical encoder on Gemini-generated synthetic data for multiple languages yields a bi-encoder that matches or exceeds BioBERT-ST on clinical code retrieval metrics, with further gains from cross-encoder reranking on most languages.
MDIA, a specialty-routed 7-node multi-agent system, reports 0.6272 accuracy on 525 HealthBench Professional cases using GPT-5.4, outperforming the ChatGPT for Clinicians baseline by 3.72 points and attributing the lift to architectural components.
citing papers explorer
-
AutoMedBench: Towards Medical AutoResearch with Agentic AI Models
AutoMedBench evaluates AI agents on long-horizon medical workflows across five stages and finds validation and submission as dominant failure points based on thousands of runs.
-
HealthAgentBench: A Unified Benchmark Suite of Realistic Agentic Healthcare Environments for Challenging Frontier AI Agents
HealthAgentBench is a new benchmark of 54 healthcare agent tasks where even the strongest frontier AI agent reaches only about 42% success rate on end-to-end clinical workflows.
-
RadThinking: A Dataset for Longitudinal Clinical Reasoning in Radiology
RadThinking releases a large longitudinal CT VQA dataset stratified into foundation perception questions, single-rule reasoning questions, and compositional multi-step chains grounded in clinical reporting standards for cancer screening.
-
Generalistic or Specific Embeddings, Which is Better? An Empirical Study on Search for Clinical Coding in Non-English Languages
Fine-tuning a Spanish biomedical encoder on Gemini-generated synthetic data for multiple languages yields a bi-encoder that matches or exceeds BioBERT-ST on clinical code retrieval metrics, with further gains from cross-encoder reranking on most languages.
-
MDIA: A Multi-Agent Diagnostic Intelligence Pipeline on HealthBench Professional
MDIA, a specialty-routed 7-node multi-agent system, reports 0.6272 accuracy on 525 HealthBench Professional cases using GPT-5.4, outperforming the ChatGPT for Clinicians baseline by 3.72 points and attributing the lift to architectural components.