Pith. sign in

hub

How contextual are contextualized word representations? comparing the geometry of bert, elmo, and gpt-2 embeddings

17 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 9 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

17 Pith papers citing it
9 external citations · Pith
abstract

Replacing static word embeddings with contextualized word representations has yielded significant improvements on many NLP tasks. However, just how contextual are the contextualized representations produced by models such as ELMo and BERT? Are there infinitely many context-specific representations for each word, or are words essentially assigned one of a finite number of word-sense representations? For one, we find that the contextualized representations of all words are not isotropic in any layer of the contextualizing model. While representations of the same word in different contexts still have a greater cosine similarity than those of two different words, this self-similarity is much lower in upper layers. This suggests that upper layers of contextualizing models produce more context-specific representations, much like how upper layers of LSTMs produce more task-specific representations. In all layers of ELMo, BERT, and GPT-2, on average, less than 5% of the variance in a word's contextualized representations can be explained by a static embedding for that word, providing some justification for the success of contextualized representations.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 4

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 17

roles

background 4

polarities

background 2 unclear 2

representative citing papers

Riemannian Geometry for Pre-trained Language Model Embeddings

cs.CL · 2026-07-08 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Aggregating per-token pullback metrics via the Fréchet mean on the SPD manifold outperforms Euclidean mean pooling for sentence classification, with most of the gain attributable to geometric aggregation rather than learned encoder structure.

NITP: Next Implicit Token Prediction for LLM Pre-training

cs.CL · 2026-05-24 · conditional · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

NITP augments next-token prediction with cosine alignment to stop-gradient shallow-layer features of the next token, improving geometry and downstream scores at ~2% extra training FLOPs.

Geometry-Calibrated Conformal Abstention for Language Models

cs.CL · 2026-04-30 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Geometry-calibrated conformal abstention lets language models abstain from uncertain queries with finite-sample guarantees on both participation rate and conditional correctness of answers.

GPC: Large-Scale Generative Pretraining for Transferable Motor Control

cs.CV · 2026-06-28 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

GPC learns a motion vocabulary via Finite Scalar Quantization and end-to-end RL, then trains an autoregressive transformer for next-token control generation, achieving 99.98% motion reproduction success with emergent robustness.

Representation Without Reward: A JEPA Audit for LLM Fine-Tuning

cs.LG · 2026-05-14 · conditional · novelty 5.0

An empirical audit of 22 JEPA-style training auxiliaries on Llama-3.2-1B fine-tuning for regex generation finds no statistically significant task improvement after multiple-testing correction, even when auxiliaries visibly alter hidden-state geometry.

citing papers explorer

Showing 17 of 17 citing papers.