The paper claims that alignment requires treating AI as part of the self through cognitive co-regulation, identifying risks like deskilling and automation bias while drawing on System 0 cognition theory.
Oxford University Press, Oxford
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2roles
background 2representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Position: AI as Part of Self -- Extending the Mind Requires Cognitive Co-Regulation
The paper claims that alignment requires treating AI as part of the self through cognitive co-regulation, identifying risks like deskilling and automation bias while drawing on System 0 cognition theory.
- Cognitive Comparability and the Limits of Governance: Evaluating Authority Under Radical Capability Asymmetry