pith. sign in

arxiv: 1102.2587 · v4 · pith:MKUI2LXUnew · submitted 2011-02-13 · 🌀 gr-qc · quant-ph

Atom Interferometers and the Gravitational Redshift

classification 🌀 gr-qc quant-ph
keywords gravitationalatomredshiftargumentsclaimclockcomptonequivalence
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

From the principle of equivalence, Einstein predicted that clocks slow down in a gravitational field. Since the general theory of relativity is based on the principle of equivalence, it is essential to test this prediction accurately. Muller, Peters and Chu claim that a reinterpretation of decade old experiments with atom interferometers leads to a sensitive test of this gravitational redshift effect at the Compton frequency. Wolf et al dispute this claim and adduce arguments against it. In this article, we distill these arguments to a single fundamental objection: an atom is NOT a clock ticking at the Compton frequency. We conclude that atom interferometry experiments conducted to date do not yield such sensitive tests of the gravitational redshift. Finally, we suggest a new interferometric experiment to measure the gravitational redshift, which realises a quantum version of the classical clock "paradox".

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.