pith. sign in

arxiv: 1403.7752 · v2 · pith:YQB35J7Onew · submitted 2014-03-30 · 💻 cs.NE · cs.IT· cs.LG· math.IT

Auto-encoders: reconstruction versus compression

classification 💻 cs.NE cs.ITcs.LGmath.IT
keywords auto-encoderdenoisingreconstructionauto-encoderscodelengthcontractivedataerror
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We discuss the similarities and differences between training an auto-encoder to minimize the reconstruction error, and training the same auto-encoder to compress the data via a generative model. Minimizing a codelength for the data using an auto-encoder is equivalent to minimizing the reconstruction error plus some correcting terms which have an interpretation as either a denoising or contractive property of the decoding function. These terms are related but not identical to those used in denoising or contractive auto-encoders [Vincent et al. 2010, Rifai et al. 2011]. In particular, the codelength viewpoint fully determines an optimal noise level for the denoising criterion.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.