pith. sign in

arxiv: 1504.04049 · v3 · pith:7XM67IWGnew · submitted 2015-04-15 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT· math.OC

Distributed Gradient Methods with Variable Number of Working Nodes

classification 💻 cs.IT math.ITmath.OC
keywords gradientdistributednodesactivemethodalgorithmlocalprobability
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:7XM67IWG Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{7XM67IWG}

Prints a linked pith:7XM67IWG badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

We consider distributed optimization where $N$ nodes in a connected network minimize the sum of their local costs subject to a common constraint set. We propose a distributed projected gradient method where each node, at each iteration $k$, performs an update (is active) with probability $p_k$, and stays idle (is inactive) with probability $1-p_k$. Whenever active, each node performs an update by weight-averaging its solution estimate with the estimates of its active neighbors, taking a negative gradient step with respect to its local cost, and performing a projection onto the constraint set; inactive nodes perform no updates. Assuming that nodes' local costs are strongly convex, with Lipschitz continuous gradients, we show that, as long as activation probability $p_k$ grows to one asymptotically, our algorithm converges in the mean square sense (MSS) to the same solution as the standard distributed gradient method, i.e., as if all the nodes were active at all iterations. Moreover, when $p_k$ grows to one linearly, with an appropriately set convergence factor, the algorithm has a linear MSS convergence, with practically the same factor as the standard distributed gradient method. Simulations on both synthetic and real world data sets demonstrate that, when compared with the standard distributed gradient method, the proposed algorithm significantly reduces the overall number of per-node communications and per-node gradient evaluations (computational cost) for the same required accuracy.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.