Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improved list-decodability of random linear binary codes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1801.07839 v4 pith:AMJAWDH5 submitted 2018-01-24 cs.IT math.IT

Improved list-decodability of random linear binary codes

classification cs.IT math.IT
keywords codesrandomlinearepsilonlist-decodableargumenthighlist
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

There has been a great deal of work establishing that random linear codes are as list-decodable as uniformly random codes, in the sense that a random linear binary code of rate $1 - H(p) - \epsilon$ is $(p,O(1/\epsilon))$-list-decodable with high probability. In this work, we show that such codes are $(p, H(p)/\epsilon + 2)$-list-decodable with high probability, for any $p \in (0, 1/2)$ and $\epsilon > 0$. In addition to improving the constant in known list-size bounds, our argument, which is quite simple, works simultaneously for all values of $p$, while previous works obtaining $L = O(1/\epsilon)$ patched together different arguments to cover different parameter regimes. Our approach is to strengthen an existential argument of (Guruswami, H{\aa}stad, Sudan and Zuckerman, IEEE Trans. IT, 2002) to hold with high probability. To complement our upper bound for random linear codes, we also improve an argument of (Guruswami, Narayanan, IEEE Trans. IT, 2014) to obtain an essentially tight lower bound of $1/\epsilon$ on the list size of uniformly random codes; this implies that random linear codes are in fact more list-decodable than uniformly random codes, in the sense that the list sizes are strictly smaller. To demonstrate the applicability of these techniques, we use them to (a) obtain more information about the distribution of list sizes of random linear codes and (b) to prove a similar result for random linear rank-metric codes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.