pith. sign in

arxiv: 1803.04579 · v1 · pith:4QIIEA3Tnew · submitted 2018-03-12 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CL

It was the training data pruning too!

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CL
keywords modelpruningdataperformancecertainsteptrainingablation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We study the current best model (KDG) for question answering on tabular data evaluated over the WikiTableQuestions dataset. Previous ablation studies performed against this model attributed the model's performance to certain aspects of its architecture. In this paper, we find that the model's performance also crucially depends on a certain pruning of the data used to train the model. Disabling the pruning step drops the accuracy of the model from 43.3% to 36.3%. The large impact on the performance of the KDG model suggests that the pruning may be a useful pre-processing step in training other semantic parsers as well.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.