REVIEW
On Approximation Methods in the Study of Boson Stars
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
On Approximation Methods in the Study of Boson Stars
read the original abstract
We analyze the accuracy of the variational method in computing physical quantities relevant for gravitationally bound Bose-Einstein condensates. Using a variety of variational ans\"atze found in existing literature, we determine physical quantities and compare them to exact numerical solutions. We conclude that a "linear+exponential" wavefunction proportional to $(1 + \xi)\exp(-\xi)$ (where $\xi$ is a dimensionless radial variable) is the best fit for attractive self-interactions along the stable branch of solutions, while for small particle number $N$ it is also the best fit for repulsive self-interactions. For attractive self-interactions along the unstable branch, a single exponential is the best fit for small $N$, while a sech wavefunction fits better for large $N$. The Gaussian wavefunction ansatz, which is used often in the literature, is exceedingly poor across most of the parameter space, with the exception of repulsive interactions for large $N$. We investigate a "double exponential" ansatz with a free constant parameter, which is computationally efficient and can be optimized to fit the exact solutions in different limits. We show that the double exponential can be tuned to fit the sech ansatz, which is computationally slow. We also show how to generalize the addition of free parameters in order to create more computationally efficient ans\"atze using the double exponential. Determining the best ansatz, according to several comparison parameters, will be important for analytic descriptions of dynamical systems. Finally, we examine the underlying relativistic theory, and critically analyze the Thomas-Fermi approximation often used in the literature.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.