Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Guided Zoom: Questioning Network Evidence for Fine-grained Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.02626 v2 pith:Y2DICHTN submitted 2018-12-06 cs.CV

Guided Zoom: Questioning Network Evidence for Fine-grained Classification

classification cs.CV
keywords guidedmodelzoomclassificationevidencenetworkpredictionconvolutional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We propose Guided Zoom, an approach that utilizes spatial grounding of a model's decision to make more informed predictions. It does so by making sure the model has "the right reasons" for a prediction, defined as reasons that are coherent with those used to make similar correct decisions at training time. The reason/evidence upon which a deep convolutional neural network makes a prediction is defined to be the spatial grounding, in the pixel space, for a specific class conditional probability in the model output. Guided Zoom examines how reasonable such evidence is for each of the top-k predicted classes, rather than solely trusting the top-1 prediction. We show that Guided Zoom improves the classification accuracy of a deep convolutional neural network model and obtains state-of-the-art results on three fine-grained classification benchmark datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.