pith. sign in

arxiv: 1903.10561 · v1 · pith:RP3D6C44new · submitted 2019-03-25 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.CY

On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoders

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.CY
keywords encoderssentencetestbiaseswordsocialassociationbias
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The Word Embedding Association Test shows that GloVe and word2vec word embeddings exhibit human-like implicit biases based on gender, race, and other social constructs (Caliskan et al., 2017). Meanwhile, research on learning reusable text representations has begun to explore sentence-level texts, with some sentence encoders seeing enthusiastic adoption. Accordingly, we extend the Word Embedding Association Test to measure bias in sentence encoders. We then test several sentence encoders, including state-of-the-art methods such as ELMo and BERT, for the social biases studied in prior work and two important biases that are difficult or impossible to test at the word level. We observe mixed results including suspicious patterns of sensitivity that suggest the test's assumptions may not hold in general. We conclude by proposing directions for future work on measuring bias in sentence encoders.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks

    cs.CL 2019-08 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Sentence-BERT adapts BERT with siamese and triplet networks to produce sentence embeddings for efficient cosine-similarity comparisons, cutting computation time from hours to seconds on similarity search while matchin...

  2. LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications

    cs.CL 2022-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LaMDA shows that fine-tuning on human-value annotations and consulting external knowledge sources significantly improves safety and factual grounding in large dialog models beyond what scaling alone achieves.

  3. Good Secretaries, Bad Truck Drivers? Occupational Gender Stereotypes in Sentiment Analysis

    cs.CL 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Authors release a new 800-sentence gender-balanced profession dataset and use it to test occupational gender stereotypes in three sentiment analysis models.

  4. DebiasRAG: A Tuning-Free Path to Fair Generation in Large Language Models through Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DebiasRAG uses a three-stage RAG process to generate and rerank query-specific debiasing contexts that act as fairness constraints for LLM outputs.

  5. Galactica: A Large Language Model for Science

    cs.CL 2022-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Galactica, a science-specialized LLM, reports higher scores than GPT-3, Chinchilla, and PaLM on LaTeX knowledge, mathematical reasoning, and medical QA benchmarks while outperforming general models on BIG-bench.

  6. Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigation

    cs.CL 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A literature review that categorizes bias in LLMs, surveys evaluation and mitigation techniques, and discusses ethical implications.