Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Can tangle calculus be applicable to hyperpolynomials?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.00208 v1 pith:S3FVR2TW submitted 2019-05-01 hep-th math.GTmath.QA

Can tangle calculus be applicable to hyperpolynomials?

classification hep-th math.GTmath.QA
keywords polynomialscompositemacdonaldtopologicalhopfrepresentationsverticescalculus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We make a new attempt at the recently suggested program to express knot polynomials through topological vertices, which can be considered as a possible approach to the tangle calculus: we discuss the Macdonald deformation of the relation between the convolution of two topological vertices and the HOMFLY-PT invariant of the 4-component link $L_{8n8}$, which both depend on four arbitrary representations. The key point is that both of these are related to the Hopf polynomials in composite representations, which are in turn expressed through composite Schur functions. The latter are further expressed through the skew Schur polynomials via the remarkable Koike formula. It is this decomposition that breaks under the Macdonald deformation and gets restored only in the (large $N$) limit of $A^{\pm 1}\longrightarrow 0$. Another problem is that the Hopf polynomials in the composite representations in the refined case are "chiral bilinears" of Macdonald polynomials, while convolutions of topological vertices involve "non-chiral combinations" with one of the Macdonald polynomials entering with permuted $t$ and $q$. There are also other mismatches between the Hopf polynomials in the composite representation and the topological 4-point function in the refined case, which we discuss.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.