pith. sign in

arxiv: 1905.01392 · v2 · pith:CIRF7ENUnew · submitted 2019-05-04 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CV· cs.NE· stat.ML

A Survey on Neural Architecture Search

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CVcs.NEstat.ML
keywords architecturelearningsearchdeepalgorithmsalongapproachesautomated
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The growing interest in both the automation of machine learning and deep learning has inevitably led to the development of a wide variety of automated methods for neural architecture search. The choice of the network architecture has proven to be critical, and many advances in deep learning spring from its immediate improvements. However, deep learning techniques are computationally intensive and their application requires a high level of domain knowledge. Therefore, even partial automation of this process helps to make deep learning more accessible to both researchers and practitioners. With this survey, we provide a formalism which unifies and categorizes the landscape of existing methods along with a detailed analysis that compares and contrasts the different approaches. We achieve this via a comprehensive discussion of the commonly adopted architecture search spaces and architecture optimization algorithms based on principles of reinforcement learning and evolutionary algorithms along with approaches that incorporate surrogate and one-shot models. Additionally, we address the new research directions which include constrained and multi-objective architecture search as well as automated data augmentation, optimizer and activation function search.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RELO: Reinforcement Learning to Localize for Visual Object Tracking

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RELO replaces handcrafted spatial priors with a reinforcement learning policy for target localization in visual tracking and reports 57.5% AUC on LaSOText without template updates.

  2. RELO: Reinforcement Learning to Localize for Visual Object Tracking

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RELO formulates visual object tracking localization as a Markov decision process solved by reinforcement learning with combined IoU and AUC rewards, augmented by layer-aligned temporal token propagation, and reports 5...

  3. XferNAS: Transfer Neural Architecture Search

    cs.LG 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    XferNAS transfers knowledge across neural architecture searches to reduce search time by a factor of 33 on CIFAR-10/100 while achieving new records of 1.99% and 14.06% error.

  4. Self-Adaptive 2D-3D Ensemble of Fully Convolutional Networks for Medical Image Segmentation

    eess.IV 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Self-adaptive 2D-3D FCN ensemble optimized by multiobjective evolution for prostate segmentation on PROMISE12 achieves top-10 ranking with smaller size than prior auto-designed models.