Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Model Validation Using Mutated Training Labels: An Exploratory Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.10201 v4 pith:LXV3BWDN submitted 2019-05-24 cs.LG stat.ML

Model Validation Using Mutated Training Labels: An Exploratory Study

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords modeltrainingvalidationdatalabelsmutateddifferentexploratory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce an exploratory study on Mutation Validation (MV), a model validation method using mutated training labels for supervised learning. MV mutates training data labels, retrains the model against the mutated data, then uses the metamorphic relation that captures the consequent training performance changes to assess model fit. It does not use a validation set or test set. The intuition underpinning MV is that overfitting models tend to fit noise in the training data. We explore 8 different learning algorithms, 18 datasets, and 5 types of hyperparameter tuning tasks. Our results demonstrate that MV is accurate in model selection: the model recommendation hit rate is 92\% for MV and less than 60\% for out-of-sample-validation. MV also provides more stable hyperparameter tuning results than out-of-sample-validation across different runs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.