Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Learning Smooth Representation for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.10748 v4 pith:7ZGI4Y3W submitted 2019-05-26 cs.CV

Learning Smooth Representation for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

classification cs.CV
keywords domainadaptationtargetunsuperviseddatasetslipschitzmethodsamount
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Typical adversarial-training-based unsupervised domain adaptation methods are vulnerable when the source and target datasets are highly-complex or exhibit a large discrepancy between their data distributions. Recently, several Lipschitz-constraint-based methods have been explored. The satisfaction of Lipschitz continuity guarantees a remarkable performance on a target domain. However, they lack a mathematical analysis of why a Lipschitz constraint is beneficial to unsupervised domain adaptation and usually perform poorly on large-scale datasets. In this paper, we take the principle of utilizing a Lipschitz constraint further by discussing how it affects the error bound of unsupervised domain adaptation. A connection between them is built and an illustration of how Lipschitzness reduces the error bound is presented. A \textbf{local smooth discrepancy} is defined to measure Lipschitzness of a target distribution in a pointwise way. When constructing a deep end-to-end model, to ensure the effectiveness and stability of unsupervised domain adaptation, three critical factors are considered in our proposed optimization strategy, i.e., the sample amount of a target domain, dimension and batchsize of samples. Experimental results demonstrate that our model performs well on several standard benchmarks. Our ablation study shows that the sample amount of a target domain, the dimension and batchsize of samples indeed greatly impact Lipschitz-constraint-based methods' ability to handle large-scale datasets. Code is available at https://github.com/CuthbertCai/SRDA.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.