pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.07800 · v1 · pith:6MLTDVCUnew · submitted 2019-07-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.EP· astro-ph.GA· astro-ph.HE

The Social Sciences Interdisciplinarity for Astronomy and Astrophysics -- Lessons from the History of NASA and Related Fields

Anamaria Berea , Kathryn Denning , Monica Vidaurri , Kimberly Arcand , Michael P. Oman-Reagan , Jillian Bellovary , Arsev Umur Aydinoglu , Mark Lupisella This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 19:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.COastro-ph.EPastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords interdisciplinaritysocial sciencesastronomyastrophysicsNASAastrobiologyDecadal Surveyplanetary sciences
0
0 comments X

The pith

Social sciences have historically supported NASA missions and must be integrated into astronomy and astrophysics to meet community needs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that social sciences have contributed to NASA research and missions yet remain sparsely integrated with astronomy, astrophysics, and planetary sciences despite a demonstrated need. It uses historical examples, the case of astrobiology, and results from an ad-hoc survey of the Astro2020 community to show scientists' aspirations for such work. A sympathetic reader would care because understanding and measuring interdisciplinarity could strengthen space science outcomes by drawing on social science methods and perspectives.

Core claim

Social sciences have played a documented role in NASA research and missions, yet interdisciplinarity between social sciences and astronomy or astrophysics is sparse; an imperative necessity for greater integration exists, as illustrated by successful examples like astrobiology and confirmed by an ad-hoc survey of the Astro2020 Decadal Survey community that captures scientists' needs, aspirations, and experiences.

What carries the argument

Historical review of social sciences' role in NASA combined with an ad-hoc survey of the Astro2020 scientific community.

If this is right

  • Astronomy and astrophysics projects would benefit from routine inclusion of social science perspectives on topics like public engagement and mission design.
  • Lessons from astrobiology's interdisciplinarity with social sciences can be transferred to other space science domains.
  • All scientists should develop ways to measure and track interdisciplinarity to improve research practices.
  • Community input from surveys like the one in Astro2020 should guide future Decadal Survey planning on collaboration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Funding programs could prioritize proposals that include social scientists as co-investigators on astronomy missions.
  • Training programs in astronomy departments might add modules on social science methods to prepare researchers for interdisciplinary work.
  • Metrics of mission success could be expanded to include social outcomes such as public trust or policy impact if the necessity claim holds.

Load-bearing premise

The ad-hoc survey of the Astro2020 community supplies representative evidence of scientists' needs for social science interdisciplinarity.

What would settle it

A broader, systematic survey of astronomers and astrophysicists that finds no expressed need or benefit from social science collaboration would undermine the necessity claim.

read the original abstract

In this paper we showcase the importance of understanding and measuring interdisciplinarity and other -disciplinarity concepts for all scientists, the role social sciences have historically played in NASA research and missions, the sparsity of social science interdisciplinarity in space and planetary sciences, including astronomy and astrophysics, while there is an imperative necessity for it, and the example of interdisciplinarity between social sciences and astrobiology. Ultimately we give voice to the scientists across all fields with respect to their needs, aspirations and experiences in their interdisciplinary work with social sciences through an ad-hoc survey we conducted within the Astro2020 Decadal Survey scientific community.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims there is an imperative necessity for social science interdisciplinarity in astronomy, astrophysics, and space/planetary sciences. It supports this with historical examples of social science roles in NASA research and missions, notes the current sparsity of such work, gives an astrobiology case study, and presents results from an ad-hoc survey of the Astro2020 Decadal Survey community to articulate scientists' needs, aspirations, and experiences.

Significance. If the historical narrative and survey evidence were shown to be representative and methodologically sound, the work could usefully document a gap in current practice and motivate greater integration of social sciences into astrophysics missions and decadal planning. The absence of documented survey methodology, however, prevents the empirical portion from carrying the weight of the necessity claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the ad-hoc Astro2020 survey supplies representative evidence of community needs rests on an undocumented sampling frame, response rate, demographic composition, or comparison to the full Decadal Survey participant pool; without these the results cannot be distinguished from selection bias toward respondents already interested in the topic.
  2. [Survey description] Survey description (throughout): no quantitative analysis, response statistics, or bias controls are supplied, so the qualitative statements about scientists' experiences cannot be evaluated for generalizability and therefore do not substantiate the 'imperative necessity' conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from an explicit statement of the paper's scope (e.g., whether it aims to be a review, a position paper, or an empirical study).
  2. Historical NASA examples are presented interpretively; adding citations to primary mission documents or prior historical analyses would strengthen traceability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which highlight important limitations in how the survey is presented. We agree that the ad-hoc nature of the survey and lack of methodological detail prevent it from supporting strong claims of representativeness or generalizability. We will revise the manuscript to address these issues directly, reframing the survey as illustrative rather than evidentiary for the core necessity argument, which rests primarily on the historical analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the ad-hoc Astro2020 survey supplies representative evidence of community needs rests on an undocumented sampling frame, response rate, demographic composition, or comparison to the full Decadal Survey participant pool; without these the results cannot be distinguished from selection bias toward respondents already interested in the topic.

    Authors: We acknowledge this limitation. The survey was distributed informally via Astro2020-related channels without a predefined sampling frame or tracking of response statistics, and these details were not reported. In the revised version we will update the abstract to remove any implication that the survey provides representative evidence. We will add an explicit methods and limitations paragraph describing the ad-hoc distribution method and stating that results reflect only the experiences of respondents who chose to participate, without claims of generalizability or absence of selection bias. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Survey description] Survey description (throughout): no quantitative analysis, response statistics, or bias controls are supplied, so the qualitative statements about scientists' experiences cannot be evaluated for generalizability and therefore do not substantiate the 'imperative necessity' conclusion.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the current text supplies no response statistics, quantitative analysis, or bias controls. The survey was always intended as a qualitative collection of individual perspectives rather than a basis for statistical inference. We will revise the manuscript to (1) add a dedicated survey limitations subsection, (2) remove or qualify any language suggesting the survey alone demonstrates 'imperative necessity,' and (3) reposition the necessity claim to rest on the NASA historical narrative and astrobiology case study, treating the survey results strictly as supplementary illustrations of community experiences. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; argument relies on external historical references and new survey data

full rationale

The paper advances its central claim of necessity for social-science interdisciplinarity through interpretive historical review of NASA and related programs plus results from a newly conducted ad-hoc survey of the Astro2020 community. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-referential constructions appear. Historical examples are drawn from external sources rather than prior work by the same authors, and the survey constitutes independent primary data rather than a renamed or fitted input. The argument is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing reduction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of stated historical facts about NASA and the representativeness of the ad-hoc survey as evidence for necessity; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Social sciences have historically played an important role in NASA research and missions
    Invoked in abstract as foundational example for lessons learned.
  • domain assumption Social science interdisciplinarity is sparse in astronomy, astrophysics, and planetary sciences
    Stated as observed condition creating the imperative for change.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5687 in / 1209 out tokens · 31731 ms · 2026-05-24T19:45:59.021261+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and was the reason why Professor Blumberg hired an anthropologist near the time of program conception to help design the collaboration process for early NAI endeavors (Pilcher, 2015). Other examples of social scientists working with engineers and physicists include psychologists that have worked and continue to work on the human spaceflight program or the...

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise

    Interdisciplinarity, cross-disciplinarity, multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity Marilyn Stember’s paper (1997) “Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise” offers the following definitions of different levels of disciplinarity: ● Intradisciplinary: working within a single discipline. ● Cross-disciplinary: viewing one dis...

    work page 1997

  3. [3]

    Social Sciences and Planetary Sciences Some interesting interdisciplinary studies come from planetary science and importance of equity and inclusion of women in planetary missions

    Social Sciences and Other Sciences 3.1. Social Sciences and Planetary Sciences Some interesting interdisciplinary studies come from planetary science and importance of equity and inclusion of women in planetary missions. These were published at the Planetary Science Decadal Survey 2013-2022. The authors recommend that: “Alongside scientific and technical ...

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Aesthetics & Astronomy,

    Other studies on social sciences and planetary sciences refer to the fields of planetary defense and planetary protection (Billings, 2015). Studies in space economics and anthropological work related to planetary defense and planetary protection have been also recently conducted by Alissa Haddaji. These emphasize the need for sound economics and business ...

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Putting The Stars Within Reach

    What misconceptions do the non-experts have about astronomy and the images they are exposed to? More specifically, Kimberly Kowal Arcand’s research project with the University of Otago & NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory “Putting The Stars Within Reach” investigates issues at the intersection of social science, computer science and astronomy. One facet of ...

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Another overall look at astrobiology is taking a view at the culture evolution of the field (Billings, 2012)

    submitted for this decadal survey is a comprehensive and in-depth overview of the state of the profession describing large community efforts that cross multiple fields of study. Another overall look at astrobiology is taking a view at the culture evolution of the field (Billings, 2012). A comprehensive history of the astrobiology field and the connections...

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    what you do

    and in two volumes from Steven J. Dick (Dick, 2015, 2018). Astrobiology and social sciences have a long history together and multiple topics and avenues of common pursuit. One of them, as mentioned before and also in the next section, is on social impact and strategies in case of detection (Shostak and Oliver, 2000), while others are exploring both the hi...

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    “The social science study of space technology in general provides a perspective useful to a study of the Shuttle system

    and for NASA missions overall. “The social science study of space technology in general provides a perspective useful to a study of the Shuttle system. During the 1960s and 1970s a variety of books, articles, studies, and research projects addressed the relation of space technology to one or several aspects of society. By 1978 the volume of activity was s...

    work page 1978

  9. [9]

    NASA is an agency and workplace that is unique in many regards

    as well as in societal impacts of spaceflight (Dick, 2007). NASA is an agency and workplace that is unique in many regards. From deep space missions to crewed launches and the potential travel to Mars, there are numerous ways that NASA can utilize social sciences, which begin very early in the science traceability matrix. Unfortunately, the current framew...

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    participant

    was the study of a number of teams at both universities and NASA to observe the day to day work to best understand both the science and sociality that goes into producing knowledge about the cosmos. The anthropologist takes seriously the “participant” part of participant observation (the idea that in order to know another community you have to be as invol...

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    common sense

    What is interdisciplinarity for you? What do you understand to be an interdisciplinary team or interdisciplinary project? Have you been a part of interdisciplinary teams or projects? If yes, what was the main question you were trying to answer and what was your experience with this (success and failures)? The answers of the community on this question rang...

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    It takes time to effectively learn what a scientific community does and make a contribution

    Barriers to Effective Interdisciplinary Work including Social Scientists One of the largest barriers to interdisciplinary work is time. It takes time to effectively learn what a scientific community does and make a contribution. Another barrier is education and training, together with career options. Currently there are unclear training pipelines or caree...

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    More details about what the community wants and needs can be found above in the answers to this informal survey

    Paths Forward Based on this community work and effort and the direct interactions with scientists on both social sciences and other sciences, some of the immediate paths forward can be regular seminar series, workshops, ongoing conversations from which collaborations can grow, funding support for travel and collaborations, visiting scholarships and invita...

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Data management in astrobiology: Challenges and opportunities for an interdisciplinary community

    Arcand, K.K., Jubett, A., Watzke, M., Price, S., Williamson, K., Edmonds, P. (2019). Touching the Stars: Improving NASA 3D Printed Data Sets with Blind and Visually Impaired Audiences. JCOM Journal of Science Communication. 11 Aydinoglu, A.U., Taskin, Z. (2018). Origins of life research: A bibliometric approach. Origins of Life and Evolutions of Biosphere...

    work page doi:10.1007/s11084-017-9543-4 2019

  15. [15]

    Wowing the Public: The Shuttle as a Cultural Icon

    Billings, L. (2006). How shall we live in space? Culture, law and ethics in spacefaring society. Space Policy, 22(4), 249-255. Billings, L. (2012). "Wowing the Public: The Shuttle as a Cultural Icon." Space Shuttle Legacy :

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    A few words about “broader impacts

    Billings, L. (2012). Astrobiology in culture: the search for extraterrestrial life as “science”. Astrobiology, 12(10), 966-975. Billings, L. (2015). Words matter: A call for responsible communication about asteroid impact hazards and plans for planetary defense. Space Policy, 33, 8-12. Billing, L. (2016). “A few words about “broader impacts” of science“, ...

    work page doi:10.1089/153110703322610573 2012

  17. [17]

    Human Exploration Ethnography of the Haughton-Mars Project 1998-99

    Clancey, W. J. (2002). “Human Exploration Ethnography of the Haughton-Mars Project 1998-99.” In On to Mars: Colonizing a New World. Zubrin, R. & Crossman, F. eds., Burlington, Ont.: Apogee Books. Clancey, W. J. (2012). Working on Mars Voyages of Scientific Discovery with the Mars Exploration Rovers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mappin...

    work page doi:10.2307/1229039 2002

  18. [18]

    Preparing for the Discovery of Life Beyond Earth

    Denning, K. (2009). Social Evolution State of the field. In Cosmos & Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context(Vol. 4802, p. 63). 12 Denning, K. (2011). Being technological. In Searching for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (pp. 477-496). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Denning, K. (2011). ‘L’on Earth. Civilizations Beyond Earth: Extraterrestrial Life an...

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    Dick, S. J., ed. (2007). Societal impact of spaceflight. Government Printing Office. Dick. S.J. ed. (2015). The Impact of Discovering Life Beyond Earth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Dick, S. J. (2018). Astrobiology, discovery, and societal impact. Vol

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Anthropology and the Humanization of Space

    Cambridge University Press. Dick, S. J., & Lupisella, M. L., eds. (2009). Cosmos & Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context. Government Printing Office. Finney, Ben. (1987). “Anthropology and the Humanization of Space.” Acta Astronautica 15 (3): 189–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(87)90019-1. Finney, Be...

    work page doi:10.1016/0094-5765(87)90019-1 2009

  21. [21]

    Culture on the Moon: Bodies in Time and Space

    “Culture on the Moon: Bodies in Time and Space.” Archaeologies 12 (1): 110–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-015-9286-7. Harrison, A. A. (1997). After Contact: The Human Response to Extraterrestrial Life. New York: Plenum. Harrison, A. A. (2002). Spacefaring: The Human Dimension. Berkeley; London: University of California Press. Hays, L., Archenbach, L.,...

    work page doi:10.1007/s11759-015-9286-7 1997

  22. [22]

    Astronomers at the Observatory: Place, Visual Practice, Traces

    “Astronomers at the Observatory: Place, Visual Practice, Traces.” Anthropological Quarterly 85 (4): 1141–60. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2012.0068. Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., Hauser, C.E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology, 16(4).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.20 04956 Impey, C., Spitz, A.H...

    work page doi:10.1353/anq.2012.0068 2012

  23. [23]

    Washington, DC: The National Academies Press

    Assessment of the NASA Astrobiology Institute. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Science Foundation (2018). Science & engineering indicators

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    NASA and the Search for Technosignatures: A Report from the NASA Technosignatures Workshop

    Retrieved from https://nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/ NPS (2019). National Park Service Website. Available online at: https://www.nps.gov/nature/request-a-permit.htm Oman-Reagan, Michael P. (2019). “Politics of Planetary Reproduction and the Children of Other Worlds.” Futures 110 (June): 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.02.015. Oman-Reagan...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.02.015 2018

  25. [25]

    Black Holes and Vacuum Cleaners: Using Metaphor, Relevance, and Inquiry in Labels for Space Images

    Smith, L.S., Smith, J.K, Arcand K.K, Smith, R.K, & Bookbinder, J. (2015b). "Aesthetics and Astronomy: How Labels Affect Understanding and Appreciating Deep Space Images," Curator. Smith, L.S., Arcand, K.K., Smith, B.K., Smith, R.K., Smith, J.K., & Bookbinder, J. (2017a).Capturing the many faces of an exploded star: Communicating complex and evolving astro...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1576-8 2019