pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.08727 · v1 · pith:IJ4LSU3Gnew · submitted 2019-07-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

Trinity: An Air-Shower Imaging Instrument to detect Ultrahigh Energy Neutrinos

A. Nepomuk Otte (1) , Anthony M. Brown (2) , Michele Doro (3) , Abe Falcone (4) , Jamie Holder (5) , Eleanor Judd (6) , Philip Kaaret (7) , Mos\`e Mariotti (3)
show 9 more authors
Kohta Murase (4) Ignacio Taboada (1) ((1) Georgia Institute of Technology (2) Durham University (3) INFN Padova (4) Pennsylvania State University (5) University of Delaware (6) UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory (7) University of Iowa)
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 18:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords ultrahigh energy neutrinostau neutrinosearth-skimming neutrinosair-shower imagingneutrino astronomyultrahigh energy cosmic raysIceCube
0
0 comments X

The pith

Trinity adapts air-shower imaging to detect earth-skimming tau neutrinos between 10^7 and 10^10 GeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes Trinity, an instrument that applies proven air-shower imaging methods from gamma-ray and cosmic-ray observatories to capture light from particle cascades produced by tau neutrinos skimming the Earth. Successful detection in this energy band would link the astrophysical neutrino flux observed by IceCube to specific source populations, identify origins and composition of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays, and probe neutrino interactions at the highest energies. The design treats the imaging technique as already mature enough to be re-optimized for neutrino-induced showers with adequate collection area and background suppression.

Core claim

Trinity is a proposed air-shower imaging system optimized for the detection of earth-skimming ultrahigh energy tau neutrinos with energies between 10^7 GeV and 10^10 GeV. It will pursue three major scientific objectives: narrowing in on possible source classes responsible for the astrophysical neutrino flux measured by IceCube, helping find the sources of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays and understand their composition, and testing fundamental neutrino physics at the highest energies. The system relies on the imaging technique already used successfully by the very high-energy gamma-ray community and the UHECR community.

What carries the argument

Air-shower imaging, which records the Cherenkov or fluorescence light pattern produced by extensive air showers to reconstruct arrival direction, energy, and particle type.

If this is right

  • Detection of tau neutrinos would constrain the source classes producing the IceCube flux.
  • Coincident events with ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays would help map their accelerators and composition.
  • Observed interaction rates at these energies would test predictions of neutrino cross sections and flavor mixing beyond current accelerator limits.
  • Non-detection after several years would tighten upper bounds on the tau neutrino component of the astrophysical flux.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the imaging approach works for tau neutrinos, the same hardware could be retuned to search for other neutrino flavors or for cosmogenic neutrinos produced by cosmic-ray interactions with the cosmic microwave background.
  • Placement near existing gamma-ray arrays would enable real-time cross-checks between neutrino candidates and gamma-ray or cosmic-ray events from the same sky direction.

Load-bearing premise

The established air-shower imaging technique can be adapted with sufficient sensitivity and background rejection to register earth-skimming tau neutrinos in the stated energy range.

What would settle it

A detailed Monte Carlo simulation or prototype measurement that shows the effective aperture for tau neutrinos falls below the level needed to produce even one event per year of operation would falsify the proposed sensitivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.08727 by (2) Durham University, (3) INFN Padova, (4) Pennsylvania State University, (5) University of Delaware, (6) UC Berkeley, (7) University of Iowa), Abe Falcone (4), A. Nepomuk Otte (1), Anthony M. Brown (2), Eleanor Judd (6), Ignacio Taboada (1) ((1) Georgia Institute of Technology, Jamie Holder (5), Kohta Murase (4), Michele Doro (3), Mos\`e Mariotti (3), Philip Kaaret (7), Space Sciences Laboratory.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Production of ultrahigh energy neutrinos via the collision of cosmic microwave back￾ground photons with ultrahigh energy cosmic-ray protons. 1 Science Goals and Objectives: Opening the UHE neutrino band The last ten years have brought us the stunning capabilities of detecting gravitational waves and astrophysical high-energy neutrinos. With these new windows opened to the universe, we witness the dawn of m… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Sensitivity of Trinity and other proposed experiments with flux measurements and recent limits. The sensitivities are quoted for an all flavour neutrino flux and three years of obser￾vation. For Trinity a 20% duty cycle is assumed. Figure from [50]. Key performance requirement: Imaging of air showers Trinity’s task is to image parti￾cle showers in the atmosphere (air showers). The concept is illustrated on… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Optical design of one Trinity telescope. The focal length is 5.6 m. The light collecting sur￾face of 4 m×17 m is tessel￾lated with 1 m×1 m sized mirror elements. Each of the 3,300 pixel in the fo￾cal plane (red) has a size of 19 mm×19 mm and accepts light from a 4 m×4 m large portion of the light collect￾ing surface. Camera The camera of a Trinity telescope is equipped with 3,300 silicon photomultipliers (… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Prototype mirrors produced with the thin glass replica method. The mirror has a diameter from edge to edge of 1.5 m. The mir￾rors for Trinity will be square with a length of 0.5 m to 1 m. Optics The optical system is divided into the mirrors, the structure that holds the mirrors, and the non-imaging light concentrators, which attach to the SiPMs. The light-collecting surface of the telescope is tesselated … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Trinity is a proposed air-shower imaging system optimized for the detection of earth-skimming ultrahigh energy tau neutrinos with energies between $10^7$ GeV and $10^{10}$ GeV. Trinity will pursue three major scientific objectives. 1) It will narrow in on possible source classes responsible for the astrophysical neutrino flux measured by IceCube. 2) It will help find the sources of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECR) and understand the composition of UHECR. 3) It will test fundamental neutrino physics at the highest energies. Trinity uses the imaging technique, which is well established and successfully used by the very high-energy gamma-ray community (CTA, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, and VERITAS) and the UHECR community (Telescope Array, Pierre Auger)

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes Trinity, an air-shower imaging instrument optimized for detecting earth-skimming ultrahigh-energy tau neutrinos in the 10^7–10^10 GeV range. It outlines three science objectives: narrowing in on source classes for the IceCube astrophysical neutrino flux, identifying UHECR sources and composition, and testing fundamental neutrino physics at the highest energies. The design adapts the established imaging technique used by CTA, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, VERITAS, Telescope Array, and Pierre Auger.

Significance. If the adaptation of air-shower imaging can be shown to deliver adequate sensitivity and background rejection for the tau-neutrino channel, the instrument would open a new observational window on UHE neutrinos and provide a valuable complement to IceCube and UHECR arrays. The proposal correctly identifies the multi-messenger potential of linking neutrino and cosmic-ray data. The absence of any performance metrics, however, leaves the significance prospective rather than demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that Trinity 'will narrow in on possible source classes responsible for the astrophysical neutrino flux' (and similarly for the UHECR and fundamental-physics goals) is load-bearing yet unsupported; no Monte Carlo results, effective-area curves, angular/energy resolution figures, or background-rejection efficiencies specific to the earth-skimming tau-decay geometry are supplied.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the imaging technique is 'well established' by gamma-ray and UHECR observatories does not address the distinct observational challenges of the tau-neutrino channel (e.g., the horizontal geometry, lower expected event rate, and cosmic-ray background discrimination at 10^7–10^10 GeV); without quantitative validation the mapping from established technique to stated performance remains an assertion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our proposal for the Trinity instrument. The feedback correctly identifies that the abstract language is prospective and that the distinct challenges of the earth-skimming tau channel require explicit acknowledgment. We have revised the abstract to use more measured phrasing that distinguishes design goals from demonstrated performance metrics, which are outside the scope of this conceptual paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that Trinity 'will narrow in on possible source classes responsible for the astrophysical neutrino flux' (and similarly for the UHECR and fundamental-physics goals) is load-bearing yet unsupported; no Monte Carlo results, effective-area curves, angular/energy resolution figures, or background-rejection efficiencies specific to the earth-skimming tau-decay geometry are supplied.

    Authors: We agree that the original abstract wording presented the science objectives as certain outcomes rather than design goals. This manuscript is a conceptual proposal and does not contain the requested quantitative performance studies. We have revised the abstract to state that Trinity is optimized to pursue these objectives, with detailed sensitivity studies planned for subsequent work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the imaging technique is 'well established' by gamma-ray and UHECR observatories does not address the distinct observational challenges of the tau-neutrino channel (e.g., the horizontal geometry, lower expected event rate, and cosmic-ray background discrimination at 10^7–10^10 GeV); without quantitative validation the mapping from established technique to stated performance remains an assertion.

    Authors: We accept the referee's point that the tau-neutrino geometry introduces challenges (horizontal viewing, lower rates, and background discrimination) that differ from gamma-ray or vertical UHECR observations. The revised abstract now notes that while the imaging approach builds on established techniques, dedicated validation of its application to earth-skimming tau decays is required and will be addressed in follow-on studies. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Instrument proposal contains no derivations, fits, or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The paper is a forward-looking instrument proposal for Trinity that invokes the established air-shower imaging technique from external gamma-ray (CTA, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, VERITAS) and UHECR (Telescope Array, Pierre Auger) observatories. No equations, parameter fits, predictions, or derivations appear in the provided text. All citations reference independent external experiments rather than self-citations that could form a load-bearing chain. The central claims rest on the assertion that the technique can be adapted, but this is presented as an unquantified design choice rather than a result derived from the paper's own inputs. No patterns of self-definition, fitted-input-as-prediction, or ansatz smuggling are present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on the domain assumption that gamma-ray imaging hardware and analysis can be repurposed for neutrino-induced showers; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The imaging technique successfully used by CTA, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, VERITAS, Telescope Array, and Pierre Auger can be adapted for earth-skimming tau neutrino detection.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the technical foundation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5783 in / 1227 out tokens · 26214 ms · 2026-05-24T18:36:05.570450+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. POLARIS: A Sparse Radial Neutrino Telescope Design for the Pacific Ocean

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    POLARIS is a radial sparse Cherenkov detector that targets the natural horizontal geometry of ultra-high-energy neutrino-induced muons to reach PeV sensitivities with only 1100 modules.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., et al. Multi- messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. Astrophysical Journal Let- ters, 848(2):L12 (2017). doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9 2017

  2. [2]

    Abbott, R

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., et al.Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 848(2):L13 (2017). doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ aa920c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ 2017

  3. [3]

    D., Cenko, B., et al.A Summary of Multimessenger Science with Neutron Star Mergers

    Burns, E., Tohuvavohu, A., Buckley, J., Canton, T. D., Cenko, B., et al.A Summary of Multimessenger Science with Neutron Star Mergers. In BAAS, volume 51, page 38 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    2018, Science, 361, eaat1378, doi: 10.1126/science.aat1378

    Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A. Science, 361(6398):eaat1378 (2018). doi:10.1126/science.aat1378. URL http://science.sciencemag.org/content/361/6398/eaat1378.abstract

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aat1378 2018

  5. [5]

    Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert

    IceCube Collaboration, I. Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert. Science (New York, N.Y.) , 361(6398):147–151 (2018). ISSN 1095-9203. doi:10.1126/science.aat2890. URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002248

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aat2890 2018

  6. [6]

    Huang, D.-J

    Murase, K. and Waxman, E.Constraining high-energy cosmic neutrino sources: Impli- cations and prospects. Phys. Rev. D, 94(10):103006 (2016). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94. 103006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94 2016

  7. [7]

    High-energy neutrino astrophysics

    Halzen, F. High-energy neutrino astrophysics. Nature Physics, 13(3):232–238 (2017). doi:10.1038/nphys3816

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3816 2017

  8. [8]

    Mészáros, D

    Mészáros, P., Fox, D. B., Hanna, C., and Murase, K.Multi-Messenger Astrophysics. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1906.10212 (2019)

    work page arXiv 1906

  9. [9]

    Astrophysics Uniquely Enabled by Observations of High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos

    Ackermann, M., Ahlers, M., Anchordoqui, L., Bustamante, M., Connolly, A., et al. Astrophysics Uniquely Enabled by Observations of High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1903.04334 (2019)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  10. [10]

    Murase, K., Ahlers, M., and Lacki, B. C. Testing the hadronuclear origin of PeV neutrinos observed with IceCube. Phys. Rev. D, 88(12):121301 (2013). doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.88.121301

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    and Murase, K.Linking high-energy cosmic particles by black-hole jets embed- ded in large-scale structures

    Fang, K. and Murase, K.Linking high-energy cosmic particles by black-hole jets embed- ded in large-scale structures. Nature Physics, 14(4):396–398(2018). doi:10.1038/s41567- 017-0025-4. Bibliography & References Cited 12

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567- 2018

  12. [12]

    arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1903.04447 (2019)

    Buson, S., Fang, K., Keivani, A., Maccarone, T., Murase, K., et al.A Unique Mes- senger to Probe Active Galactic Nuclei: High-Energy Neutrinos. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1903.04447 (2019)

    work page arXiv 1903

  13. [13]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aada00

    Murase, K., Oikonomou, F., and Petropoulou, M.Blazar Flares as an Origin of High- energy Cosmic Neutrinos? ApJ, 865(2):124 (2018). doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aada00

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aada00 2018

  14. [14]

    Sarazin, F., Anchordoqui, L., Beatty, J., Bergman, D., Covault, C., et al.What is the nature and origin of the highest-energy particles in the universe?In BAAS, volume 51, page 93 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Alves Batista, et al., Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies arXiv:1903.06714

    Alves Batista, R., Biteau, J., Bustamante, M., Dolag, K., Engel, R., et al. Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies . arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1903.06714 (2019)

    work page arXiv 1903

  16. [16]

    Beresinsky, V. S. and Zatsepin, G. T.Cosmic rays at ultra high energies (neutrino?). Physics Letters B, 28(6):423–424 (1969). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(69)90341-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(69)90341-4 1969

  17. [17]

    Kotera, K., Allard, D., and Olinto, A. V. Cosmogenic neutrinos: Parameter space and detectabilty from PeV to ZeV. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2010(10):013–013 (2010). ISSN 14757516. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/ 2010

  18. [18]

    7fc7a70cb06490de9c0d9dada9148509

    URL http://stacks.iop.org/1475-7516/2010/i=10/a=013?key=crossref. 7fc7a70cb06490de9c0d9dada9148509

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Kampert, K. H. and Unger, M.Measurements of the cosmic ray composition with air shower experiments. Astroparticle Physics, 35(10):660–678 (2012). ISSN 09276505. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.02.004. URL http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0927650512000382

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.02.004 2012

  20. [20]

    J., et al.Evidence for a mixed mass composition at the ‘ankle’ in the cosmic-ray spectrum

    The Pierre Auger Collaboration, A., Aab, A., Abreu, P., Aglietta, M., Ahn, E. J., et al.Evidence for a mixed mass composition at the ‘ankle’ in the cosmic-ray spectrum. Physics Letters B, Volume 762, p. 288-295., 762:288–295 (2016). ISSN 0370-2693. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.039. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb. 2016.09.039

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.039 2016

  21. [21]

    Kuzmichev, I

    Yushkov, A. Recent results from the Pierre Auger Observatory on the mass composi- tion and hadronic interactions of ultra-high energy cosmic rays. In Pattison, B., ed- itor, ISVHECRI 2016, volume 145, page 05002. EPJ Web of Conferences, Moscow (2017). ISSN 2100-014X. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201614505002. URL http://www.epj- conferences.org/10.1051/epjconf/201...

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/201614505002 2016

  22. [22]

    2017, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2017, 038, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/04/038

    Aab, A., Abreu, P., Aglietta, M., Samarai, I. A., Albuquerque, I., et al.Combined fit of spectrum and composition data as measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2017(04):038–038 (2017). ISSN 1475-7516. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/04/038. URL http://stacks.iop.org/1475-7516/2017/i= 04/a=038?key=crossref.004...

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/04/038 2017

  23. [23]

    Aab, A., Abreu, P., Aglietta, M., Al Samarai, I., Albuquerque, I. F. M., et al.Inferences on mass composition and tests of hadronic interactions from 0.3 to 100 EeV using the water-Cherenkov detectors of the Pierre Auger Observatory. Physical Review D, 96(12):122003(2017). ISSN2470-0010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.122003. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.122003 2017

  24. [24]

    A., De Almeida, R

    Alves Batista, R., de Almeida, R. M., Lago, B., and Kotera, K.Cosmogenic photon and neutrino fluxes in the Auger era. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2019(1):2 (2019). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/002

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/002 2019

  25. [25]

    Astrophysical Journal, 872(1):110 (2019)

    Boncioli, D., Biehl, D., and Winter, W.On the Common Origin of Cosmic Rays across the Ankle and Diffuse Neutrinos at the Highest Energies from Low-luminosity Gamma- Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal, 872(1):110 (2019). doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafda7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafda7 2019

  26. [26]

    Zhang, B. T. and Murase, K.Ultrahigh-energy cosmic-ray nuclei and neutrinos from engine-driven supernovae. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1812.10289 (2018)

    work page arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    A., Goldberg, H., Halzen, F., Ringwald, A., et al.Neu- trinos as a diagnostic of cosmic ray galactic-extragalactic transition

    Ahlers, M., Anchordoqui, L. A., Goldberg, H., Halzen, F., Ringwald, A., et al.Neu- trinos as a diagnostic of cosmic ray galactic-extragalactic transition. Phys. Rev. D, 72(2):23001 (2005). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.023001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.023001 2005

  28. [28]

    2009, Astroparticle Physics, 31, 201, doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2009.01.006

    Takami, H., Murase, K., Nagataki, S., and Sato, K.Cosmogenic neutrinos as a probe of the transition from Galactic to extragalactic cosmic rays. Astroparticle Physics, 31(3):201–211 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2009.01.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2009.01.006 2009

  29. [29]

    M., Wang, X.-Y., and Aharonian, F

    Liu, R.-Y., Taylor, A. M., Wang, X.-Y., and Aharonian, F. A.Indication of a local fog of subankle ultrahigh energy cosmic rays. Phys. Rev. D, 94(4):43008 (2016). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.043008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.043008 2016

  30. [30]

    and Beacom, J

    Murase, K. and Beacom, J. F. Neutrino background flux from sources of ultrahigh- energy cosmic-ray nuclei. Phys. Rev. D, 81(12):123001 (2010). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 81.123001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2010

  31. [31]

    van Vliet, A., Alves Batista, R., and Hörand el, J. R. Determining the fraction of cosmic-ray protons at ultra-high energies with cosmogenic neutrinos. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1901.01899 (2019)

    work page arXiv 1901

  32. [32]

    The Giant Radio Array for Neutrino Detection (GRAND): Science and Design

    GRAND Collaboration, G., Alvarez-Muniz, J., Batista, R. A., V., A. B., Bolmont, J., et al. The Giant Radio Array for Neutrino Detection (GRAND): Science and Design (2018). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.09994

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Fundamental Physics with High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos

    Ackermann, M., Ahlers, M., Anchordoqui, L., Bustamante, M., Connolly, A., et al. Fundamental Physics with High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos . arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1903.04333 (2019)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  34. [34]

    S., Babu, K

    Bhupal Dev, P. S., Babu, K. S., Denton, P. B., Machado, P. A. N., Argüelles, C. A., et al. Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: A Status Report. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1907.00991 (2019). Bibliography & References Cited 14

    work page arXiv 1907

  35. [35]

    T., Daily, T., Davis, R., Jr., Distel, J

    Cleveland, B. T., Daily, T., Davis, R., Jr., Distel, J. R., Lande, K., et al.Measurement of the Solar Electron Neutrino Flux with the Homestake Chlorine Detector. The Astro- physical Journal, 496(1):505–526 (1998). ISSN 0004-637X. doi:10.1086/305343. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/496/i=1/a=505

    work page doi:10.1086/305343 1998

  36. [36]

    Physical Review Letters, 81(8):1562–1567 (1998)

    Fukuda, Y., Hayakawa, T., Ichihara, E., Inoue, K., Ishihara, K., et al.Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos. Physical Review Letters, 81(8):1562–1567 (1998). ISSN 10797114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1562. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1562

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1562 1998

  37. [37]

    R., Allen, R

    Ahmad, Q. R., Allen, R. C., Andersen, T. C., Anglin, J. D., Bühler, G., et al.Mea- surement of the Rate ofνe+d→p+p+e− Interactions Produced by 8B Solar Neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. Physical Review Letters, 87(7):071301 (2001). ISSN 0031-9007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.071301. URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.071301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.071301 2001

  38. [38]

    R., Allen, R

    Ahmad, Q. R., Allen, R. C., Andersen, T. C., D.Anglin, J., Barton, J. C., et al.Direct Evidence for Neutrino Flavor Transformation from Neutral-Current Interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. Physical Review Letters, 89(1):011301 (2002). ISSN 10797114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.011301. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.89.011301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.011301 2002

  39. [39]

    Measurement of the multi-TeV neutrino cross section with IceCube using Earth absorption

    IceCube Collaboration, I., Aartsen, M. G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., Aguilar, J. A., et al. Measurement of the multi-TeV neutrino cross section with IceCube us- ing Earth absorption. Nature, 551:596–600 (2017). doi:10.1038/nature24459. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.08119

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature24459 2017

  40. [40]

    Physical Review Letters, 120(7):071801 (2018)

    Aartsen, M., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., Aguilar, J., Ahlers, M., et al.Measurement of Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at 6–56 GeV with IceCube DeepCore. Physical Review Letters, 120(7):071801 (2018). ISSN 0031-9007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120. 071801. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.071801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120 2018

  41. [41]

    Klein, S. R. and Connolly, A. Neutrino Absorption in the Earth, Neutrino Cross- Sections, and New Physics(2013). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.4891

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Ryabov, V. A. Ultrahigh-energy neutrinos from astrophysical sources and superheavy particle decays. Physics-Uspekhi, 49(9):905 (2006). ISSN 1063-7869. doi:10.1070/ PU2006v049n09ABEH006052. URL http://stacks.iop.org/1063-7869/49/i=9/a= R02

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    and Beacom, J

    Murase, K. and Beacom, J. F.Constraining very heavy dark matter using diffuse back- grounds of neutrinos and cascaded gamma rays. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2012(10):43 (2012). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/10/043

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/10/043 2012

  44. [44]

    E., and Kuznetsov, M

    Kachelrieß, M., Kalashev, O. E., and Kuznetsov, M. Y.Heavy decaying dark matter and IceCube high energy neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D, 98(8):83016 (2018). doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.98.083016. Bibliography & References Cited 15

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2019(5):51 (2019)

    Bhattacharya, A., Esmaili, A., Palomares-Ruiz, S., and Sarcevic, I.Update on decaying and annihilating heavy dark matter with the 6-year IceCube HESE data. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2019(5):51 (2019). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/ 05/051

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/ 2019

  46. [46]

    W., Rotter, B., Allison, P., Banerjee, O., Batten, L., et al.Observation of an Unusual Upward-Going Cosmic-Ray-like Event in the Third Flight of ANITA

    Gorham, P. W., Rotter, B., Allison, P., Banerjee, O., Batten, L., et al.Observation of an Unusual Upward-Going Cosmic-Ray-like Event in the Third Flight of ANITA. Physical Review Letters, 121(16):161102 (2018). ISSN 10797114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121. 161102. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121 2018

  47. [47]

    Constraints on the ultra-high energy cosmic neutrino flux from the fourth flight of ANITA

    Gorham, P. W., Allison, P., Banerjee, O., Batten, L., Beatty, J. J., et al.Constraints on the ultra-high energy cosmic neutrino flux from the fourth flight of ANITA(2019). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.04005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Fox, D. B., Sigurdsson, S., Shandera, S., Mészáros, P., Murase, K., et al.The ANITA Anomalous Events as Signatures of a Beyond Standard Model Particle, and Supporting Observations from IceCube. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1809.09615 (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    H., Dev, P

    Collins, J. H., Dev, P. S. B., and Sui, Y.R -parity violating supersymmetric explanation of the anomalous events at ANITA. Phys. Rev. D, 99(4):43009 (2019). doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.99.043009

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Anchordoqui, L. A. and Antoniadis, I.Supersymmetric sphaleron configurations as the origin of the perplexing ANITA events. Physics Letters B, 790:578–582 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.02.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.02.003 2019

  51. [51]

    Otte, A. N. Studies of an air-shower imaging system for the detection of ultrahigh- energy neutrinos(2019). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.083012. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.083012

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.083012 2019

  52. [52]

    Observations of the Crab Nebula with H.E.S.S

    Aharonian, F., Akhperjanian, A. G., Bazer-Bachi, A. R., Beilicke, M., Ben- bow, W., et al. Observations of the Crab nebula with HESS . Astronomy & Astrophysics, 457(3):899–915 (2006). ISSN 0004-6361. doi:10.1051/0004-6361: 20065351. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0607333http://dx.doi.org/10. 1051/0004-6361:20065351http://www.aanda.org/10.1051/0004-6361...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361: 2006

  53. [54]

    and Collaboration, f

    Holder, J. and Collaboration, f. t. V. Latest Results from VERITAS: Gamma 2016 (2016). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02881

    work page arXiv 2016

  54. [55]

    The Pierre Auger Collaboration, T. P. A., Aab, A., Abreu, P., Aglietta, M., Albu- querque, I. F. M., et al. The Pierre Auger Observatory: Contributions to the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2017)(2017). URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1708.06592. Bibliography & References Cited 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [56]

    Automatic reconstruction of parametric building models from indoor point clouds

    Tokuno, H., Tameda, Y., Takeda, M., Kadota, K., Ikeda, D., et al. New air flu- orescence detectors employed in the Telescope Array experiment. Nuclear Instru- ments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, De- tectors and Associated Equipment, 676:54–65 (2012). ISSN 0168-9002. doi:10.1016/J. NIMA.2012.02.044. URL https://www....

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2012

  56. [57]

    Horizontal Tau air showers from mountains in deep valley. Traces of UHECR neutrino tau

    Fargion, D., Aiello, A., and Conversano, R.Horizontal Tau air showers from mountains in deep valley. Traces of UHECR neutrino tau(1999). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ astro-ph/9906450

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  57. [58]

    L., Ansoldi, S., Antonelli, L

    Ahnen, M. L., Ansoldi, S., Antonelli, L. A., Arcaro, C., Baack, D., et al. Limits on the flux of tau neutrinos from 1 PeV to 3 EeV with the MAGIC telescopes. Astroparticle Physics, 102:77–88 (2018). ISSN 09276505. doi:10. 1016/j.astropartphys.2018.05.002. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0927650518300136?via%3Dihub

    work page 2018

  58. [59]

    De- sign and operation of FACT-the first G-APD Cherenkov telescope

    Anderhub, H., Backes, M., Biland, A., Boccone, V., Braun, I., et al. De- sign and operation of FACT-the first G-APD Cherenkov telescope. Journal of In- strumentation, 8(6):P06008–P06008 (2013). ISSN 17480221. doi:10.1088/1748- 0221/8/06/P06008. URL http://stacks.iop.org/1748-0221/8/i=06/a=P06008? key=crossref.215223ca70483ee275407a04fbb44da8

    work page doi:10.1088/1748- 2013

  59. [60]

    MACHETE: A transit Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope to survey half of the Very High Energy $\gamma$-ray sky

    Cortina, J., López-Coto, R., and Moralejo, A. MACHETE: A transit imaging at- mospheric Cherenkov telescope to survey half of the very high energyγ-ray sky. As- troparticle Physics, 72:46–54 (2016). ISSN 09276505. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys. 2015.07.001. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02532http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.astropartphys.2015.07.001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys 2016

  60. [61]

    MUSIC: An 8 channel readout ASIC for SiPM arrays

    Gómez, S., Gascón, D., Fernández, G., Sanuy, A., Mauricio, J., et al. MUSIC: An 8 channel readout ASIC for SiPM arrays. volume 9899, page 98990G. Interna- tional Society for Optics and Photonics (2016). ISBN 978-1-5106-0144-4. ISSN 0277- 786X. doi:10.1117/12.2231095. URLhttp://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ proceeding.aspx?doi=10.1117/12.2231095

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2231095 2016

  61. [62]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and As- sociated Equipment, 887:81–93 (2018)

    Pollacco, E., Grinyer, G., Abu-Nimeh, F., Ahn, T., Anvar, S., etal.GET: A generic elec- tronics system for TPCs and nuclear physics instrumentation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and As- sociated Equipment, 887:81–93 (2018). ISSN 01689002. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.01.020. URL https://w...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.01.020 2018

  62. [63]

    Otte, A. N. Development of a Cherenkov Telescope for the Detection of Ultra-High Energy Neutrinos with EUSO-SPB2 and POEMMA. In36th International Cosmic Ray Conference, page 8. Proceedings of Science, Madison, WI (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [64]

    M., Armstrong, T., Chadwick, P

    Brown, A. M., Armstrong, T., Chadwick, P. M., Daniel, M., White, R., et al.Flasher and muon-based calibration of the GCT telescopes proposed for the Cherenkov Telescope Array. arXiv e-prints (2015). Bibliography & References Cited 17

    work page 2015

  64. [65]

    Brown, A. M. On the prospects of cross-calibrating the Cherenkov Telescope Array with an airborne calibration platform. Astroparticle Physics, 97:69–79 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.10.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.10.013 2018