Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Saliency Methods for Explaining Adversarial Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.08413 v4 pith:XCWBYSE7 submitted 2019-08-22 cs.CV

Saliency Methods for Explaining Adversarial Attacks

classification cs.CV
keywords saliencymethodsexplainguidedbpmapsclassificationclassificationsdecisions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The classification decisions of neural networks can be misled by small imperceptible perturbations. This work aims to explain the misled classifications using saliency methods. The idea behind saliency methods is to explain the classification decisions of neural networks by creating so-called saliency maps. Unfortunately, a number of recent publications have shown that many of the proposed saliency methods do not provide insightful explanations. A prominent example is Guided Backpropagation (GuidedBP), which simply performs (partial) image recovery. However, our numerical analysis shows the saliency maps created by GuidedBP do indeed contain class-discriminative information. We propose a simple and efficient way to enhance the saliency maps. The proposed enhanced GuidedBP shows the state-of-the-art performance to explain adversary classifications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions

    cs.CY 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Current XAI methods for DNNs and LLMs rest on paradoxes and false assumptions that demand a paradigm shift to verification protocols, scientific foundations, context-aware design, and faithful model analysis rather th...

  2. Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions

    cs.CY 2026-02 reject novelty 4.0

    A position paper argues that post-hoc XAI explanations are unfaithful and paradoxical, proposing a shift to expert-based verification and certification of AI systems.