Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Deep Concept-wise Temporal Convolutional Networks for Action Localization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.09442 v1 pith:EJR6I2AB submitted 2019-08-26 cs.CV

Deep Concept-wise Temporal Convolutional Networks for Action Localization

classification cs.CV
keywords temporalactionconceptsconvolutionlocalizationconcept-wiseconvolutionallayer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Existing action localization approaches adopt shallow temporal convolutional networks (\ie, TCN) on 1D feature map extracted from video frames. In this paper, we empirically find that stacking more conventional temporal convolution layers actually deteriorates action classification performance, possibly ascribing to that all channels of 1D feature map, which generally are highly abstract and can be regarded as latent concepts, are excessively recombined in temporal convolution. To address this issue, we introduce a novel concept-wise temporal convolution (CTC) layer as an alternative to conventional temporal convolution layer for training deeper action localization networks. Instead of recombining latent concepts, CTC layer deploys a number of temporal filters to each concept separately with shared filter parameters across concepts. Thus can capture common temporal patterns of different concepts and significantly enrich representation ability. Via stacking CTC layers, we proposed a deep concept-wise temporal convolutional network (C-TCN), which boosts the state-of-the-art action localization performance on THUMOS'14 from 42.8 to 52.1 in terms of mAP(\%), achieving a relative improvement of 21.7\%. Favorable result is also obtained on ActivityNet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.