Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Comparative Study of Younger and Older Adults' Interaction with a Crowdsourcing Android TV App for Detecting Errors in TEDx Video Subtitles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.10078 v1 pith:GYEQDPBD submitted 2019-08-27 cs.HC cs.CYcs.MM

A Comparative Study of Younger and Older Adults' Interaction with a Crowdsourcing Android TV App for Detecting Errors in TEDx Video Subtitles

Kinga Skorupska , Manuel N\'u\~nez , Wies{\l}aw Kope\'c , Rados{\l}aw Nielek This is my paper
classification cs.HC cs.CYcs.MM
keywords adultscrowdsourcingerrorsinteractionolderyoungerandroiddetecting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper we report the results of a pilot study comparing the older and younger adults' interaction with an Android TV application which enables users to detect errors in video subtitles. Overall, the interaction with the TV-mediated crowdsourcing system relying on language profficiency was seen as intuitive, fun and accessible, but also cognitively demanding; more so for younger adults who focused on the task of detecting errors, than for older adults who concentrated more on the meaning and edutainment aspect of the videos. We also discuss participants' motivations and preliminary recommendations for the design of TV-enabled crowdsourcing tasks and subtitle QA systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.