Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Selfie: User-defined Sensitive Memory Protection and Recovery

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.04213 v1 pith:FXYQXKE6 submitted 2019-09-10 cs.CR

Selfie: User-defined Sensitive Memory Protection and Recovery

classification cs.CR
keywords memorysensitiveselfiecorruptionsolutionusersdifferentexecution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Different users always have different requirement for sensitive memory definition. It is not flexible for aborting program execution once detecting memory corruption. Because the users may loose some sensitive data. We presented Selfie, a hybrid solution to provide one flexible solution to protect the sensitive memory according to users' requirements in runtime. Finally, Selfie can provide one solution to decide whether execution needs to be recovered. If the memory corruption doesn't belong sensitive memory, Selfie provides symbolic solver that can help figure out whether the memory corruption can affect the sensitive memory in future.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.