The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 1909.04242 · v2 · pith:KRYG4KNU · submitted 2019-09-10 · cs.CL · cs.LG

Mitigating Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datasets to Improve Cross-dataset Generalization Ability

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:KRYG4KNUrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords artifactsabilityannotationcross-datasetgeneralizationbiasdatasetsevaluation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Natural language inference (NLI) aims at predicting the relationship between a given pair of premise and hypothesis. However, several works have found that there widely exists a bias pattern called annotation artifacts in NLI datasets, making it possible to identify the label only by looking at the hypothesis. This irregularity makes the evaluation results over-estimated and affects models' generalization ability. In this paper, we consider a more trust-worthy setting, i.e., cross-dataset evaluation. We explore the impacts of annotation artifacts in cross-dataset testing. Furthermore, we propose a training framework to mitigate the impacts of the bias pattern. Experimental results demonstrate that our methods can alleviate the negative effect of the artifacts and improve the generalization ability of models.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.