WIQA: A dataset for "What if..." reasoning over procedural text
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:YX2OD57Drecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
We introduce WIQA, the first large-scale dataset of "What if..." questions over procedural text. WIQA contains three parts: a collection of paragraphs each describing a process, e.g., beach erosion; a set of crowdsourced influence graphs for each paragraph, describing how one change affects another; and a large (40k) collection of "What if...?" multiple-choice questions derived from the graphs. For example, given a paragraph about beach erosion, would stormy weather result in more or less erosion (or have no effect)? The task is to answer the questions, given their associated paragraph. WIQA contains three kinds of questions: perturbations to steps mentioned in the paragraph; external (out-of-paragraph) perturbations requiring commonsense knowledge; and irrelevant (no effect) perturbations. We find that state-of-the-art models achieve 73.8% accuracy, well below the human performance of 96.3%. We analyze the challenges, in particular tracking chains of influences, and present the dataset as an open challenge to the community.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
HarmVideoBench: Benchmarking Harmful Video Understanding in Large Multimodal Models
HarmVideoBench is a multi-layered benchmark for harmful video understanding in LVLMs with three hierarchical dimensions, and BCR is a method that raises average model performance from 61.7% to 84.4%.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.