Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Revisit Policy Optimization in Matrix Form

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.09186 v1 pith:4P7JS2KG submitted 2019-09-19 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords policycitedynamicsenvironmentgivenmatrixnotationoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In tabular case, when the reward and environment dynamics are known, policy evaluation can be written as $\bm{V}_{\bm{\pi}} = (I - \gamma P_{\bm{\pi}})^{-1} \bm{r}_{\bm{\pi}}$, where $P_{\bm{\pi}}$ is the state transition matrix given policy ${\bm{\pi}}$ and $\bm{r}_{\bm{\pi}}$ is the reward signal given ${\bm{\pi}}$. What annoys us is that $P_{\bm{\pi}}$ and $\bm{r}_{\bm{\pi}}$ are both mixed with ${\bm{\pi}}$, which means every time when we update ${\bm{\pi}}$, they will change together. In this paper, we leverage the notation from \cite{wang2007dual} to disentangle ${\bm{\pi}}$ and environment dynamics which makes optimization over policy more straightforward. We show that policy gradient theorem \cite{sutton2018reinforcement} and TRPO \cite{schulman2015trust} can be put into a more general framework and such notation has good potential to be extended to model-based reinforcement learning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools