Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Local dielectric response in 1-propanol: α-relaxation versus relaxation of mesoscale structures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.10423 v1 pith:W7SDC2RJ submitted 2019-09-23 cond-mat.soft

Local dielectric response in 1-propanol: α-relaxation versus relaxation of mesoscale structures

classification cond-mat.soft
keywords dielectriclocalrelaxationmacroscopicstructuresalphacomparisondata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The dielectric Debye relaxation in monohydroxy alcohols has been subject of long-standing scientific interest and is presently believed to arise from the relaxation of transiently H-bonded supramolecular structures. Therefore, its manifestation might be expected to differ from a local dielectric probe as compared to the standard macroscopic dielectric experiment. In this work we present such local dielectric measurements obtained by triplet state solvation dynamics (TSD) and compare the results with macroscopic dielectric and light scattering data. In particular, with data from an improved TSD setup, a detailed quantitative comparison reveals that the Debye process does not significantly contribute to the local Stokes shift response function, while $\alpha$- and $\beta$-relaxations are clearly resolved. Furthermore, this comparison reveals that the structural relaxation has almost identical time constants and shape parameters in all three measurement techniques. Altogether our findings support the notion that the transiently bound chain structures lead to a strong cross-correlation contribution in macroscopic dielectric experiments, to which both light scattering and TSD are insensitive, the latter due to its local character and the former due to the molecular optical anisotropy being largely independent of the OH bonded suprastructures.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.