Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.07547 v1 pith:IHMCVBQD submitted 2019-11-18 physics.soc-ph cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.PS

The trouble with 2nd order models or how to generate stop-and-go traffic in a 1st order model

classification physics.soc-ph cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.PS
keywords modelorderdynamicsmodelsstop-and-gobehavioreffectsinertia
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Classical second order models of pedestrian dynamics, like the social-force model, suffer from various unrealistic behaviors in the dynamics, e.g. backward motion, oscillations and overlapping of pedestrians. These effects are not related to the discretization of the equations of motion, but intrinsic to the dynamics. They are the consequence of strong inertia effects that usually appear in second order models. We show that the experimentally observed stop-and-go behavior, which is an important test for any pedestrian model, can be reproduced with a stochastic first order model that does not suffer from the dynamical artefacts resulting from strong inertia. The model provides a new mechanism for stop-and-go behavior which is based on correlated noise.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.