Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Asymmetric contrarians in opinion dynamics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.01053 v2 pith:AUO4B7GX submitted 2019-12-02 physics.soc-ph cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.AO

Asymmetric contrarians in opinion dynamics

classification physics.soc-ph cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.AO
keywords contrariansmajoritylocalopinionschemeupdateactivatesdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Asymmetry in contrarian behavior is investigated within the Galam model of opinion dynamics using update groups of size 3 with two competing opinions A and B. Denoting $x$ and $y$ the respective proportions of A and B contrarians, four schemes of implementations are studied. First scheme activates contrarians after each series of updates with probabilities $x$ and $y$ for agents holding respectively opinion A and B. Second scheme activates contrarians within the update groups only against global majority with probability $x$ when A is majority and $y$ when B is majority. Third scheme considers in-group contrarians acting prior to the local majority update against both local majority and minority opinions. Last scheme activates in-group contrarians prior to the local majority update but only against the local majority. The main result is the loss of the fifty-fifty attractor produced by symmetric contrarians. Producing a bit less contrarians on its own side than the other side becomes the key to win a public debate, which in turn can guarantee an election victory. The associated phase diagram of opinion dynamics is found to exhibit a rich variety of counterintuitive results.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.