Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Trust-Region Newton-CG with Strong Second-Order Complexity Guarantees for Nonconvex Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.04365 v3 pith:4ZZDUTLA submitted 2019-12-09 math.OC

Trust-Region Newton-CG with Strong Second-Order Complexity Guarantees for Nonconvex Optimization

classification math.OC
keywords trust-regioncomplexitymethodsnewton-cgalgorithmsbeenboundsguarantees
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Worst-case complexity guarantees for nonconvex optimization algorithms have been a topic of growing interest. Multiple frameworks that achieve the best known complexity bounds among a broad class of first- and second-order strategies have been proposed. These methods have often been designed primarily with complexity guarantees in mind and, as a result, represent a departure from the algorithms that have proved to be the most effective in practice. In this paper, we consider trust-region Newton methods, one of the most popular classes of algorithms for solving nonconvex optimization problems. By introducing slight modifications to the original scheme, we obtain two methods -- one based on exact subproblem solves and one exploiting inexact subproblem solves as in the popular "trust-region Newton-Conjugate-Gradient" (trust-region Newton-CG) method -- with iteration and operation complexity bounds that match the best known bounds for the aforementioned class of first- and second-order methods. The resulting trust-region Newton-CG method also retains the attractive practical behavior of classical trust-region Newton-CG, which we demonstrate with numerical comparisons on a standard benchmark test set.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.