Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.06487 v2 pith:LBRS652F submitted 2020-02-16 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords q-learningbiasestimationmaxminoverestimationactionalgorithmalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Q-learning suffers from overestimation bias, because it approximates the maximum action value using the maximum estimated action value. Algorithms have been proposed to reduce overestimation bias, but we lack an understanding of how bias interacts with performance, and the extent to which existing algorithms mitigate bias. In this paper, we 1) highlight that the effect of overestimation bias on learning efficiency is environment-dependent; 2) propose a generalization of Q-learning, called \emph{Maxmin Q-learning}, which provides a parameter to flexibly control bias; 3) show theoretically that there exists a parameter choice for Maxmin Q-learning that leads to unbiased estimation with a lower approximation variance than Q-learning; and 4) prove the convergence of our algorithm in the tabular case, as well as convergence of several previous Q-learning variants, using a novel Generalized Q-learning framework. We empirically verify that our algorithm better controls estimation bias in toy environments, and that it achieves superior performance on several benchmark problems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Collaborative Weighting with Pessimistic Critic for Mitigating Overestimation in Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new actor-critic variant that reweights samples by TD-error and uncertainty and uses pessimistic sampled values improves continuous-control RL benchmark performance.

  2. A Forget-and-Grow Strategy for Deep Reinforcement Learning Scaling in Continuous Control

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Forget and Grow (FoG) combines decaying replay weights for old experiences with progressive critic-network expansion to improve continuous-control reinforcement learning, beating BRO, SimBa, and TD-MPC2 on most of 41 ...

Pith tools