Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Comparative Evaluation of Temporal Pooling Methods for Blind Video Quality Assessment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.10651 v1 pith:TTUPADGV submitted 2020-02-25 cs.MM cs.CV

A Comparative Evaluation of Temporal Pooling Methods for Blind Video Quality Assessment

classification cs.MM cs.CV
keywords poolingtemporalqualityblindmodelsvideoadditionalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Many objective video quality assessment (VQA) algorithms include a key step of temporal pooling of frame-level quality scores. However, less attention has been paid to studying the relative efficiencies of different pooling methods on no-reference (blind) VQA. Here we conduct a large-scale comparative evaluation to assess the capabilities and limitations of multiple temporal pooling strategies on blind VQA of user-generated videos. The study yields insights and general guidance regarding the application and selection of temporal pooling models. In addition, we also propose an ensemble pooling model built on top of high-performing temporal pooling models. Our experimental results demonstrate the relative efficacies of the evaluated temporal pooling models, using several popular VQA algorithms, and evaluated on two recent large-scale natural video quality databases. In addition to the new ensemble model, we provide a general recipe for applying temporal pooling of frame-based quality predictions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.