Designing Tools for Semi-Automated Detection of Machine Learning Biases: An Interview Study
read the original abstract
Machine learning models often make predictions that bias against certain subgroups of input data. When undetected, machine learning biases can constitute significant financial and ethical implications. Semi-automated tools that involve humans in the loop could facilitate bias detection. Yet, little is known about the considerations involved in their design. In this paper, we report on an interview study with 11 machine learning practitioners for investigating the needs surrounding semi-automated bias detection tools. Based on the findings, we highlight four considerations in designing to guide system designers who aim to create future tools for bias detection.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Critical Pragmatism Approach for Algorithmic Fairness: Lessons from Urban Planning Theory
Algorithmic fairness is framed as a wicked problem solvable via critical pragmatism from urban planning, yielding a flexible framework with recommendations tested on mortgage lending, school choice, and feminicide data cases.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.