Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Parametric Representation for Singing Voice Synthesis: a Comparative Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.04142 v1 pith:OQ5GPDHO submitted 2020-06-07 eess.AS cs.CLcs.SD

Parametric Representation for Singing Voice Synthesis: a Comparative Evaluation

classification eess.AS cs.CLcs.SD
keywords modelparametricsynthesiscomparativeevaluationplussingingspeech
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Various parametric representations have been proposed to model the speech signal. While the performance of such vocoders is well-known in the context of speech processing, their extrapolation to singing voice synthesis might not be straightforward. The goal of this paper is twofold. First, a comparative subjective evaluation is performed across four existing techniques suitable for statistical parametric synthesis: traditional pulse vocoder, Deterministic plus Stochastic Model, Harmonic plus Noise Model and GlottHMM. The behavior of these techniques as a function of the singer type (baritone, counter-tenor and soprano) is studied. Secondly, the artifacts occurring in high-pitched voices are discussed and possible approaches to overcome them are suggested.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.