Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Could regulating the creators deliver trustworthy AI?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.14750 v1 pith:ZCRR2MKK submitted 2020-06-26 cs.CY

Could regulating the creators deliver trustworthy AI?

classification cs.CY
keywords trustworthyethicsfearpointstandardswhetheraccountableaddition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Is a new regulated profession, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) Architect who is responsible and accountable for AI outputs necessary to ensure trustworthy AI? AI is becoming all pervasive and is often deployed in everyday technologies, devices and services without our knowledge. There is heightened awareness of AI in recent years which has brought with it fear. This fear is compounded by the inability to point to a trustworthy source of AI, however even the term "trustworthy AI" itself is troublesome. Some consider trustworthy AI to be that which complies with relevant laws, while others point to the requirement to comply with ethics and standards (whether in addition to or in isolation of the law). This immediately raises questions of whose ethics and which standards should be applied and whether these are sufficient to produce trustworthy AI in any event.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.