The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2006.15416 · v3 · pith:NQGPC56T · submitted 2020-06-27 · cond-mat.stat-mech · cs.LG· math.DS· nlin.AO· stat.ML

Thermodynamic Machine Learning through Maximum Work Production

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:NQGPC56Trecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cond-mat.stat-mech cs.LGmath.DSnlin.AOstat.ML
keywords learningmachinemodelthermodynamicworkadaptiveagentprinciple
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Adaptive systems -- such as a biological organism gaining survival advantage, an autonomous robot executing a functional task, or a motor protein transporting intracellular nutrients -- must model the regularities and stochasticity in their environments to take full advantage of thermodynamic resources. Analogously, but in a purely computational realm, machine learning algorithms estimate models to capture predictable structure and identify irrelevant noise in training data. This happens through optimization of performance metrics, such as model likelihood. If physically implemented, is there a sense in which computational models estimated through machine learning are physically preferred? We introduce the thermodynamic principle that work production is the most relevant performance metric for an adaptive physical agent and compare the results to the maximum-likelihood principle that guides machine learning. Within the class of physical agents that most efficiently harvest energy from their environment, we demonstrate that an efficient agent's model explicitly determines its architecture and how much useful work it harvests from the environment. We then show that selecting the maximum-work agent for given environmental data corresponds to finding the maximum-likelihood model. This establishes an equivalence between nonequilibrium thermodynamics and dynamic learning. In this way, work maximization emerges as an organizing principle that underlies learning in adaptive thermodynamic systems.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.