Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Verification of indefinite-horizon POMDPs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.00102 v1 pith:HHSNZGPR submitted 2020-06-30 cs.AI cs.LO

Verification of indefinite-horizon POMDPs

classification cs.AI cs.LO
keywords verificationproblemconsidersframeworkmdpspoliciessystemabstraction-refinement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The verification problem in MDPs asks whether, for any policy resolving the nondeterminism, the probability that something bad happens is bounded by some given threshold. This verification problem is often overly pessimistic, as the policies it considers may depend on the complete system state. This paper considers the verification problem for partially observable MDPs, in which the policies make their decisions based on (the history of) the observations emitted by the system. We present an abstraction-refinement framework extending previous instantiations of the Lovejoy-approach. Our experiments show that this framework significantly improves the scalability of the approach.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.