Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Priority Questions for Jupiter System Science in the 2020s and Opportunities for Europa Clipper

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.08609 v1 pith:X3UER6FZ submitted 2020-07-16 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EP

Kunio M. Sayanagi , Tracy Becker , Shawn Brooks , Shawn Brueshaber , Emma Dahl , Imke de Pater , Robert Ebert , Maryame El Moutamid
show 15 more authors
Leigh Fletcher Kandis Lea Jessup Alfred McEwen Philippa M. Molyneux Luke Moore Julianne Moses Quentin Nénon Glenn Orton Christopher Paranicas Mark Showalter Linda Spilker Matt Tiscareno Joseph Westlake Michael H. Wong Cindy Young
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.EP
keywords jupiterquestionssciencesystemclippereuropamissionadding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This whitepaper identifies important science questions that can be answered through exploration of the Jupiter System, with emphasis on the questions that can be addressed by the Europa Clipper Mission. We advocate for adding Jupiter System Science to the mission after launch when expanding the scientific scope will not affect the development cost.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools